JANUARY, 1907. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW.
IS NOT HONESTY THE WISEST POLICY?
It is wrong to mutilate or suppress the record of an observation of a phenomenon of nature, but it is also wrong to make a bad use of the record. In fact, it is the misuse of meteorological data, not the observing or publishing, that constitutes a crime against the community. Observation and careful research are to be encouraged as useful. Misrepresentations are to be avoided as harmful. The “Independent Press “as the” Voice of the People “should be not only “Vox Populi” but ” Vox Dei “, repressing all cheats and hoaxes, defending the truth and the best interests of the whole nation as against the self-interest of a few.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
Recent Comments
- arn on Fact Checking NASA
- Gordon Vigurs on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- arn on Fact Checking NASA
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking NASA
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking NASA
- arn on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA


Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree it’s often not the most lucrative policy.
Reblogged this on The Firewall.
If Hansen is so interested in the environment then why doesn’t he do something productive like protesting in Russia with a Greenpeace badge on.