Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
Recent Comments
- arn on “what the science shows”
- Bob G on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Bob G on “what the science shows”
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Tel on “what the science shows”
- Solar Mutant Ninjaneer on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on Precision Taxation
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Earthquakes
- conrad ziefle on “what the science shows”
1969 : Experts Say Arctic To Be Ice-Free By 1989 – More Money Needed To Study
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Steve
O/T but FYI
http://www.couriermail.com.au/technology/peter-gwynne-reporter-who-wrote-story-about-global-cooling-is-a-climate-change-believer-after-all/story-fnjww4h4-1226800020634
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
“When I wrote this story I did not see it as a blockbuster,” Gwynne told the site. “It was just an intriguing piece about what a certain group in a certain niche of climatology was thinking.”
If he lives long enough he’ll be saying the same about global warming.
Surprisingly, no mention whatsoever in the article about Ewing and Donn, whose Theory of Ice Ages (presupposing an open Arctic) was still very much current in 1969!
Gone are the days when the weather was the end-of-newscast 3-5 minute “forecast” that was the subject of so many jokes and derision. (and deservedly so)
Now, with the hunger of the 24-hour weather coverage for “content”, any nimrod with a scarey story gets coverage. Facts aren’t required, just a scarey soundbite.. And every one of these so-called scientists reach the exact same conclusion: “we need more money”.
With their accuracy track record, and the extreme difficulty of burying their past (though they are indeed trying), these clowns (“climate scientists”) should once again be the target of the derisive jokes. It just isn’t happening fast enough for me.
They should be the target of criminal investigations.
Exaggerated and fraudulent global warming claims in the name of “science” (funding) have been circulating for a long time. Over 45 years and countless billions wasted, it is time to shut the funding down completely..