Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Louis Hooffstetter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Gerald Machnee on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
1989 : NOAA Said That There Had Been No Warming In The US, And No Correlation With Climate Models
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Hanson didn’t expect to see anything in 1989, but would see it a year later. That’s after his doom and gloom testimony in Gore’s Senate hearing in 1988. That boy really has it wired to be able to predict a year in advance. Well, he did control the data.
Reblogged this on wwlee4411 and commented:
The truth is readily ignored when it goes against what you insist on believing.
Steven, you might like to read this and email the fella:-) Laurel http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/06/the-original-temperatures-project/
stevengoddard posted: ” The Milwaukee Journal – Google News Archive Search”
Why would Hansen deny greenhouse effects prior to 1990? Was their no CO2, no water vapor or any other ‘greenhouse’ gases before 1990? Or did they not receive marching orders from him until after 1989? Hansen is truly mentally disturbed.
“Why would Hansen deny greenhouse effects prior to 1990? “
It may be of interest that this paper:
Schneider S. & Rasool S., “Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols – Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate”, Science, vol.173, 9 July 1971, p.138-141
Which contains the snippet:
It is found that even an increase by a factor of 8 in the amount of CO2, which is highly unlikely in the next several thousand years, will produce an increase in the surface temperature of less than 2 deg. K.
Appears to have been peer reviewed by James Hansen.
I was unaware that Hansen had a hand in that ‘paper’. Schneider is a leftist opportunist who blamed man made aerosols for global cooling in the seventies, and even wrote a book on the subject. “The Genesis Strategy” warned of an impending ice age, based upon the observed cooling from the 1940’s to the 1970’s.
NOAA’s Hanson, not NASA’s Hansen
Gotcha.