Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Crashex on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Robertvd on Climate Scamming For Profit
And both scenarios are caused by global warming.
The only weather that is weather not caused by man is normal weather. Everybody knows that, so 100% agree. Who needs Crook ……. errrrrrrr………… Cook.
Now, what is ‘normal’?
Of course, I don’t know but I think it’ll get warmer before it gets colder . . .
Oops…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av_DAeTP6r4
Unfortunately that sums up one of the major problems of the field. Their data sets.
Pauchari visits high level climate meeting in the Netherlands hosted by the KNMI:
Pauchari lies in front of the camera:
1. Humans responsible for the weather, 1500 scientists agree on 95% certainty.
(A foot note in the same report states the scientist don’t agree and can not draw any conclusions at this moment in time.)
2. Climate warming since second half of past century human induced
3. More extreme weather events than ever before
4. We have until 2015 to reduce carbon emissions
5. After 2015 mitigation costs extremely expensive, especially for the Netherlands
In short he is repeating the same hullabaloo as usual.
Steve,
Your chart validates AGW; it’s worse than we thought.
Oh wait!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1owcncKCHg
So it is getting hotter and colder – Man-Made CO2 just has to be behind this… as Leading Climate Scientists have said, “We can’t think of anything else that could cause this!”
/sarc
It’s an upside down greenhouse effect.
I’ve asked Steven Mosher to explain this phenomenon at WUWT several times. Of course he doesn’t reply.
289.5 square miles is a minor anomaly over 8 decades, but the demented and quite psychotic cult will have a hard time explaining away the next 6 months of Cryosphere measurements…
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.recent.arctic.png