Dana Milbank: After Columbia mall shooting, no closer to gun control reforms – The Washington Post
Maryland passed some of the worst gun confiscation laws in the country last year, and the governor bragged about it. Milbank is a flagrant scoundrel.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
Reblogged this on Reality Check and commented:
Why oh why won’t these idiots just move someplace where they’ve already banned guns? France maybe? Cuba…. perhaps Moscow.
Idiots
Go ahead and pass even more punitive laws. Worked so well in Colorado, where the gun manufacturers left–rapidly. Eventually, governors will either drive out so many businesses and people there’s nothing left to work with, or they’ll be replaced with a rational human being.
That’s why progressives moved from pushing changes at the state level, to changes of federal law. They used to do things like increasing unemployment and welfare benefits in states like California, then what happened is people were actually moving to California just to get those benefits. It was screwing those states. So they switched to doing federal things because it can’t be escaped that way.
Does anyone outside of the DC area ever read the Post or NYT?
The Wall Street Journal is written for the people who run this country.
The Washington Post is written for people who think they run this country.
The New York Times is written for people who imagine they run this country.
Yes, making marijuana illegal sure stopped all the pot smokers. Maybe they should just outlaw murder, and mandate good manners.
It’s dangerous trying to to confiscate guns from criminals. They’ll worry about that problem, last.
It’s been said before – many times – but it never hurts to repeat it.
Gun control isn’t about guns, it’s about control.
Completely oblivious to Maryland’s gun control laws. This was done in a Gun Free Zone. They obviously want stronger chants to set the protective wards.
““Who gave the NRA so much power?””
Washington, Adams, Madison, Rutledge, Jefferson E-T-C!
What is it with Lefties called “Dana” ?
They can pass all the gun control laws they want, but they don’t have the manpower to enforce any of them on more than a few.
There is a good reason that in the 1930s politicians and world leaders
They realized if they left the USA intact all the Producers would beat feet to the USA and that meant the Predators would only be left with the useless Parasites.
The Predators are not dumb. First they needed to bribe the Parasites with the Producers wealth to get them to vote for their puppets and keep them in power. As Fabian, George Bernard Shaw said:
“A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.”
What the Predators never bother to mention to the Parasites is what comes next. Shaw is quite frank about how ‘Socialism’ should work.
*************************
“The moment we face it frankly we are driven to the conclusion that the community has a right to put a price on the right to live in it … If people are fit to live, let them live under decent human conditions. If they are not fit to live, kill them in a decent human way. Is it any wonder that some of us are driven to prescribe the lethal chamber as the solution for the hard cases which are at present made the excuse for dragging all the other cases down to their level, and the only solution that will create a sense of full social responsibility in modern populations?”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, Prefaces (London: Constable and Co., 1934), p. 296.
A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people’s time to look after them.”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, Lecture to the Eugenics Education Society, Reported in The Daily Express, March 4, 1910
*************************
So the Predators look upon the rest of the human race as cattle to be managed and bred for their use.
If you think this thinking is ‘Outdated’ Consider The Fabians founded the London School of Economics that trains many of the world’s business, economic and political leaders.
In the UK where the Fabians are a major force ask yourself:
“Why is Royal Society hosting pro-eugenics conference?” in 2004.
Look at the whole Fuel poverty mess in the UK where “One in four households suffer from fuel poverty” and “There were 31,000 excess deaths last winter”
Look at the whole Liverpool Care Pathway scandal where doctors were deliberately terminating the elderly and crippled children to free up bed space and “NHS [paid] millions for controversial care pathway”
Sure sounds like quiet methods for getting rid of ‘The Useless Eaters’ doesn’t it?
Humans are made up of four kinds of people Producers, Predators, Parasites and Defenders. Lets hope we can find some Defenders to vote for and soon.
+1. Concur with that.
Ok, I have not actually read the article (and don’t plan on it) but what exactly does he mean by “a month of Sundays?” That makes no sense to me… does this man not know how to use a calendar? A month of Sundays to me means one month, I suppose? Not what I think he means… time cannot be measured by picking random days because time is continuous (well, if you buy into the Theory of Relativity and the like). It would be like saying that, right now when I type this it has been 20 “quarter-afters” since yesterday!? What a goofy concept! Or am I mis-interpreting something?
30 weeks.