They just want to have an honest debate, which means silencing any opposing viewpoints.
h/t to @Foxgoose and Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
Recent Comments
- dm on The Clean Energy Boom
- arn on Up Is Down
- Bob G on Up Is Down
- arn on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on The Clock Is Ticking
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- arn on The Clock Is Ticking
- Mike Peinsipp on The Clock Is Ticking
Debate? Honest debate? Debate what?
The science is settled, Denier. No need for debate.
Shut up and get in line. Or we’ll shut you down too.
(Parody of how the “Scientists'” would respond to your post.)
He had to change exhibit A into exhibit C as I was wondering where the pattern was
What conspiracy?
The real question is: How did he know the motives of the so-called climate skeptics (CS) ?
In the absence of actual knowledge and facts, he can only assume. And oddly enough, when people make assumptions about the motives of others, they tend to project their own motives and methods.
His assumptions about the motives of others is a wonderful mirror into his own.
The thief assumes everyone else is a thief.
When I first scanned it I thought CS was short for Climate Scientist, and yeah it describes their methods pretty much down pat. The use of editors as gatekeepers has no place in science, and the peer review process has demonstrated time and again that it does not create truth, it merely enforces. the status quo.
I didn’t realize James Annan was this messed up. I mean, …
This guy Thingsbreak emailed him something, Annan bought the frame hook, line and sinker, emailed “various people” and got the journal shut down.
!?
All within a day!
I love how these desperate idiots think this whole thing is a scandal which undermines skepticism. These people live in such a closely sealed bubble it’s unbelievable. They think they win because skeptics can’t get published. Skeptics are winning because it isn’t warming.
The potential serious consequences of deception about the source of energy that powers the Sun and sustains our lives is almost beyond comprehension
Thousands or millions of human lives have been put at risk.
Our current state of “Fuel Poverty” is disguised as a problem of CO2-induced AGW to try to conserve fuel.
http://divineanarchy.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/do-we-face-a-disastrous-century-due-to-global-cooling-washingtonexaminer-com/
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/skunkworks-fusion/#comment-56544
What a sad conclusion to the scientific revolution that Copernicus started in 1543 !