Dictator Using The EPA To Steal State Lands

OFFICE OF GOVERNOR MATT MEAD
State Capitol
Cheyenne, WY 82002
Ph. (307) 777-7437

January 6, 2014

Wyoming to EPA: Place Tribal Boundary Decision on Hold and

 Reconsider

CHEYENNE, Wyo. –  In a petition to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) filed today, the State of Wyoming, through the Attorney General, says the EPA used incomplete facts and faulty legal conclusions when making its decision to change existing law and alter the boundary of the State and the Wind River Reservation (WRR). The State’s petition asks the agency to reconsider and also stay any implementation of its December decision revising the WRR boundary.

“I understand that the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes have a different opinion about the Wind River Reservation Boundary. My deep concern is about an administrative agency of the federal government altering a state’s boundary and going against over 100 years of history and law. This should be a concern to all citizens because, if the EPA can unilaterally take land away from a state, where will it stop?” Governor Matt Mead said. “I want to thank the Attorney General and his staff for acting with urgency and preparing a thorough review of the historical record. This analysis shows how flawed the EPA was in its legal justification for its decision. The federal government clearly had a predetermined outcome it sought to uphold.”

Wyoming to EPA: Place Tribal Boundary Decision on Hold

Obama is using the EPA to destroy the coal industry, steal land from states, and Boehner does nothing to stop him. Why haven’t impeachment proceedings been started?

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Dictator Using The EPA To Steal State Lands

  1. TheJollyGreenMan says:

    Because an overwhelming number of Americans voted him into office.

    • Jeff says:

      He won, but I wouldn’t call his victory overwhelming.

      • TheJollyGreenMan says:

        Overwhelming is the correct term. If the AGW mafia can use 0.01 degrees per decade to talk about a tipping point and a dramatic rise in global temperature, I can use overwhelming for a wafer thin majority.

    • Wyguy says:

      My dear Jolly, aka Obama buttboy, Nixon won by 23 %, got impeached, Clinton won by 8%, impeachement voted in House and Reagan won by 28% and democrats would have loved to impeach him. So your defense of Obama is weak and exposes your bias, which is rather pink.

      • Justa Joe says:

        “Delusional ain’t just a river in Egypt.”

      • TheJollyGreenMan says:

        Wyguy, all talk and no trousers or, all hat and no cattle as they say in Texas.

        Instead of insulting me on a blog, get off your Butt and help your local GOP. Otherwise the overwhelming majority of Americans will vote again to steal your wallet and re-arrange your family jewels whilst they have their hands in your pockets.

    • DGP says:

      3.86% is overwhelming? 34 out of 48 Presidential elections were won with higher popular vote margins. Obama’s win in 2012 was bottom third material.

      • Dave says:

        Well, I was amazed people would vote for the guy twice. But he did win. Whether it was bottom third or not is irrelevant. He’s President for 3 more years (at least LOL).

  2. R. de Haan says:

    The Reps and the Dems are in bed with each other robbing the USA wherever they can.

    On a political level all they are capable of is to present a badly staged “Dog and Pony Show”

    If you want a cleanup, the entire political establishment has to go.

    • TheJollyGreenMan says:

      Vote UKIP in May, get the UK out of the EU.

    • rw says:

      How does being “in bed with each other” explain the Obamacare vote? I think the Washington Republicans are just out of their depth; they’re moderately corrupt, go-with-the-flow types who can’t handle revolutionaries, even if these are the new wine-and-cheese variety of revolutionary. That’s why the Tea Party has to either get these guys to stiffen up or get them the hell out of Washington.

  3. Steve G says:

    I find it interesting the federal government can seize private land, without using eminent domain, to protect endangered species but I don’t see state AG’s protecting private land owners rights!

  4. I. Lou Minotti says:

    By hook or crook, America’s “progressive” elected officials and their appointed bureaucrats are doing everything in their power to implement UN Agenda 21.
    http://www.rangemagazine.com/specialreports/05-fall-taking-liberty.pdf
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ntmyc8Ia7hA

  5. don says:

    Jolly what does popularity have to do with criminality?

  6. phodges says:

    Why haven’t impeachment proceedings been started?

    Um, duh…because both parties work for the same corrupt oligarchy

  7. Dave says:

    The EPA seizure of a part of the state of Wyoming is an outrage. The US Constitution means nothing at this point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *