Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Now, there’s a coffee/screen interface quote!
Oooo … Reggie is going to be pissed at you 😉
Nah, Reggie is a stoic who suffers in dignity.
It’s the climate prophessor I’m worried about. He is the manic type who could slide into depression.
Turney is still stuck in Antarctic with his journo mates writing more doom stories.
Meanwhile the Russian icebreaker is back in NZ. 😀
http://m.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/humble-hut-plays-key-role-in-climate-change-research-20140114-30t2u.html
More from the “We’re all Doomed! brigade.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2014/01/13/3924653.htm
The autobot PR campaign is in full swing.
Reunion Time and Place has been booked!!!
Be there!!
http://www.nature.com/natureevents/science/events/22965-Arctic_Sea_Ice_Reduction_The_Evidence_Models_and_Global_Impact
Oh, to be a little mouse in the corner for that one!
The alarmists always point to anecdotal evidence or try to create their own anecdotal evidence to “prove” warming. But if we point out anecdotal evidence or they fail in their attempt to create it, that is never scientifically valid.