Twitter / SteveSGoddard: @ClimateOfGavin Your own data …
You can’t make up comedy like government scientists.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
How long do you think this data set will reflect that until is magicked away?
Soon the data will be changed to reflect a much cooler Greenland.
Changing the data to fit the agenda … it’s the NASA way!
Although their efforts to hide the truth are humorous, the possible consequences for society are deadly serious!
That’s one of the most disgusting aspects of this political process disguised as Gaia worship, but it seems that there’s a trend towards computer modeling and avoidance of data collection to silence Gaia’s voice in the political debate.
Steven,
For about 68 years, since the end of WWII, the US National Academy of Sciences, the UK’s Royal Society, and similar organizations around the globe, including the UN’s IPCC, have purposefully deceived the public about the source if energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of
1. Heavy atoms like uranium
2. Some planets like Jupiter
3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
4. Galaxies like the Milky Way
Their plan – to save the world from nuclear annihilation by forbidding knowledge of neutron repulsion – has in fact put mankind in more serious danger of total annihilation if the Sun goes to sleep for a few decades – as it has done in the past.
References for these conclusions are in my autobiography (in progress):
“A Journey to the Core of the Sun – Chapter 1: Coincidence”
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_1.pdf
“A Journey to the Core of the Sun – Chapter 2: Acceptance of Reality”
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf
With deep regrets,
– Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Off topic.
Off topic?
Do you not understand that well-intentioned efforts to save mankind from nuclear destruction in 1945 may lead to . . .
Total annihilation of human life on Earth if the Sun returns to the next cyclic quiet phase . . .
Before errors in nuclear and solar physics are corrected and reactors built to safely harvest the same basic source of energy here on Earth.
Drone off, plz.
It takes all kinds to render humanity divine.
Guys, the topic was “GISS Head Unfamiliar With His Own Data.”
So, yes, definitely “off topic.”
I interpreted the topic more broadly – as manipulation of experimental data – but that is obviously a minority opinion.
I stand corrected.
Government Scientist
Oxy Moron
But the work is easy, no downsides for being wrong and the pension is excellent.
They want to play Policy Maker, but do not want to suffer the consequences of being wrong. When their pensions are linked to the certainty of their policy recommendations, we won’t have to put up with their hysterical fear mongering about what “might” or “could” happen.
Time to un-high jack public policy making from these buffoons.
You can’t make up comedy like government scientists.
You can’t make up comedy like government “scientists”.
Fixed.
Oh great, why in the world would you tell them???
Now the data will likely disappear…
That is exactly what I am hoping for ;^)
I feared that was a possibility, but I am not quite sure it is overly wise.
As it stands, you know of a few instances of such contradicting data on their site. There could be hundreds, or even thousands, more that you just haven’t discovered *yet* though.
If you were to trigger a great purge of data you are not currently aware of, the future will be harder for yourself.
The alternative is something does happen to the few pages you know about and you can point to Gavin (or anyone reading his feed) as being responsible for the purge of contradicting information. But who is going to hold him accountable and restore the data in that scenario? Do you have that much faith in those above and around him? Sadly, not sure I do.
All I can say is, I really hope this works out the way you are hoping it will. I, in all honesty, am just fearful it may not.
*fingers crossed*
All of this data is being archived somewhere else in a neutral location, and any data destruction will be evidence.
It’s far more likely that they will just quietly change to using differently-adjusted data, & make some spurious claim of peer-review & such.
From gavin past shenanigans your wish will very likely (99% certain) be realised.
“If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”
?Mark Twain
Yes, and if you lie you can be certain it will be discovered.
They call that “coincidence !”
I’m guessing that the 2014 version has been “adjusted” to make the 1930’s cooler?
Exactly. They have completely erased the 1930’s warming.
Give the man a break! He is just keeping up the tradition established by Hanson of being a wacko nut job that will say anything no matter what the evidence. Data? We don’t need no stinking Data!
But Gavin said we are doomed??!!! Don’t “question the science”! It’s very “robust”.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-22/2013-fourth-hottest-year-on-record-for-planet-reports/5212356
One dataset is Greenland and one is the entire Arctic region. They’re different. Would you expect the whole of the US to have the same temperature such that NY couldn’t have a cold day compared with the rest?
I’m getting the impression that you are a complete moron.