GISS Head Unfamiliar With His Own Data

ScreenHunter_198 Jan. 21 10.34

Twitter / SteveSGoddard: @ClimateOfGavin Your own data …

ScreenHunter_202 Jan. 21 11.48

Twitter / SteveSGoddard: @ClimateOfGavin In 1999, your …

You can’t make up comedy like government scientists.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to GISS Head Unfamiliar With His Own Data

  1. TheJollyGreenMan says:

    How long do you think this data set will reflect that until is magicked away?

  2. darwin says:

    Soon the data will be changed to reflect a much cooler Greenland.

    Changing the data to fit the agenda … it’s the NASA way!

    • omanuel says:

      Although their efforts to hide the truth are humorous, the possible consequences for society are deadly serious!

      • cassidy421 says:

        That’s one of the most disgusting aspects of this political process disguised as Gaia worship, but it seems that there’s a trend towards computer modeling and avoidance of data collection to silence Gaia’s voice in the political debate.

  3. omanuel says:

    Steven,

    For about 68 years, since the end of WWII, the US National Academy of Sciences, the UK’s Royal Society, and similar organizations around the globe, including the UN’s IPCC, have purposefully deceived the public about the source if energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of

    1. Heavy atoms like uranium
    2. Some planets like Jupiter
    3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
    4. Galaxies like the Milky Way

    Their plan – to save the world from nuclear annihilation by forbidding knowledge of neutron repulsion – has in fact put mankind in more serious danger of total annihilation if the Sun goes to sleep for a few decades – as it has done in the past.

    References for these conclusions are in my autobiography (in progress):

    “A Journey to the Core of the Sun – Chapter 1: Coincidence”

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_1.pdf

    “A Journey to the Core of the Sun – Chapter 2: Acceptance of Reality”

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

    With deep regrets,
    – Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo

  4. Fred from Canuckistan says:

    Government Scientist
    Oxy Moron

    But the work is easy, no downsides for being wrong and the pension is excellent.

    They want to play Policy Maker, but do not want to suffer the consequences of being wrong. When their pensions are linked to the certainty of their policy recommendations, we won’t have to put up with their hysterical fear mongering about what “might” or “could” happen.

    Time to un-high jack public policy making from these buffoons.

    • geran says:

      You can’t make up comedy like government scientists.

      You can’t make up comedy like government “scientists”.

      Fixed.

  5. NotSure says:

    Oh great, why in the world would you tell them???

    Now the data will likely disappear…

    • That is exactly what I am hoping for ;^)

      • NotSure says:

        I feared that was a possibility, but I am not quite sure it is overly wise.

        As it stands, you know of a few instances of such contradicting data on their site. There could be hundreds, or even thousands, more that you just haven’t discovered *yet* though.

        If you were to trigger a great purge of data you are not currently aware of, the future will be harder for yourself.

        The alternative is something does happen to the few pages you know about and you can point to Gavin (or anyone reading his feed) as being responsible for the purge of contradicting information. But who is going to hold him accountable and restore the data in that scenario? Do you have that much faith in those above and around him? Sadly, not sure I do.

        All I can say is, I really hope this works out the way you are hoping it will. I, in all honesty, am just fearful it may not.

        *fingers crossed*

    • It’s far more likely that they will just quietly change to using differently-adjusted data, & make some spurious claim of peer-review & such.

  6. Stephen Richards says:

    From gavin past shenanigans your wish will very likely (99% certain) be realised.

  7. gator69 says:

    “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”
    ?Mark Twain

  8. Dave N says:

    I’m guessing that the 2014 version has been “adjusted” to make the 1930’s cooler?

  9. rah says:

    Give the man a break! He is just keeping up the tradition established by Hanson of being a wacko nut job that will say anything no matter what the evidence. Data? We don’t need no stinking Data!

  10. Andy Oz says:

    But Gavin said we are doomed??!!! Don’t “question the science”! It’s very “robust”.

    http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-22/2013-fourth-hottest-year-on-record-for-planet-reports/5212356

  11. One dataset is Greenland and one is the entire Arctic region. They’re different. Would you expect the whole of the US to have the same temperature such that NY couldn’t have a cold day compared with the rest?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *