1974 was the year Nixon resigned. Will history repeat itself 40 years later?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Game Over For The Climate
- Another Ice Age?
- Historic Heatwave
- Historic Heatwave
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bob G on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Jack the Insider on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Conrad Ziefle on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- arn on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Historic Heatwave
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Another Ice Age?
Real criminals do not resign.
Nor do pathologically deluded cult leaders. They tend to want to take as many people with them as they can.
Steven, this comment doesn’t relate to the posting it’s attached to, but I don’t know how else to get in touch…
You might find my article today…and the comments, many of which seem to revolve around you, interesting:
http://spectator.org/articles/57355/our-political-climate
Thanks Ross, they can’t argue with the data, so they resort to ad homs.
I have degrees in science and engineering from ASU and Rice University BTW.
Thanks for writing back so quickly…perhaps you might just not publish this comment and e-mail me directly at [email protected] if you’re so inclined. Anyway, I’m curious why (assuming the “rumors” are true) you use a pseudonym… I can imagine some reasons though I guess you have to balance those against issues of credibility, such as we’re seeing in the comments to my article.
Hey Ross! I can only speak for myself, and my experience has been death threats. I have a very unusual name and can be identified easily. But more importantly I have a brother at NASA who has had to testify in front of congress on more than one occasion, and a nephew who was named after me who also works in DC.
Then there was this…
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_Communications_headquarters_hostage_crisis
Protecting my family comes first.
Hey Gator,
I get it, and wasn’t trying to sound critical.
As I said, I can think of reasons to use a pseudonym.
Sometimes when I write about Islam or even about Obama, I think maybe I should use a pseudonym.
It would help Steven a lot if there were some way to prove the scientific credentials he has, but I don’t know of any way to do that while remaining anonymous.
Stay safe out there!
Ross
It seems a number of radio personalities in the Denver area follow this blog. Keep it up and good show!
We’re not that lucky.
Stephen, just thought you would be interested to know that if my stats on uClimate.com are right, then you are the world’s top climate poster! (At least in terms of number of articles).
That doesn’t surprise me. I get inspiration about every five minutes. (I never know where it comes from, either.)
Pity the stats don’t distinguish between posts about climate and “others”, and that would include all sites, not just Steve’s. Also “volume” “importance”, thought that might be hard to quantify.
That is not to diminish Steve’s contribution, which I think is outstanding; probably the best at “calling out” the charlatans for what they are.
Nixon resigned because he knew that impeachment was enevitable and he would certainly lose the case. No such circumstance, however you stretch the arguement, can be applied to Obama.
Good ;point. Obama’s scandals are only several orders of magnitude larger than Nixon’s.
Then where are the impeachment papers? When’s the trial.? We heard all this with Clinton. Ken Star spent millions of dollars trying to get something on Clinton and he came up with zilch! All they got him in the end was a blow job in the Oval Office.
I thought with democracy that when you don’t like a presidnmet you vote him out! Not back in for a 2nd term. |Nowadays the right sedem to think that impeachment is better than voting. I don’t understand it.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_Communications_headquarters_hostage_crisis
Sorry, wrong link and wrong lunatic.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
Hopefully he will be gone by year’s end.
How so?
Oh-Bomb-Ya’s NSA has the dirt on all the DC congress-critters.
I think the Liar-in-Chief is safe from impeachment proceedings based on that.
Nixon would have been so jealous. He only taped conversations in his office vs. the NSA hoovering-up everything. He could only aspire to these levels of corruption.
Nixon only wished he could use the IRS against his enemies. Obama actually does, but not limited to the IRS and his enemies list includes ordinary Americans. He even publicly threatened those that oppose him. Now he’s going to court to defend his actions and deplorable misuse of power.
Even Communist Bernie Sanders is acting surprised that Congress may be a victim. What a maroon.