Every year, our diligent friends at GISS cool the past further and warm the present further. But no matter how much cheating they do, they just can’t get up to Hansen’s “zero emissions after the year 2000” scenario C.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Bob G on UK Officially Sucks
- Russell Cook on UK Officially Sucks
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Independent on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on Crime In Washington DC
- Bob G on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
It’s every month. Every monthly run rewrites everything.
Bookmark this one for Mosher who says we’re all wrong about this ( and all the adjustments ).
Let’s demand he explain exactly what the problem is.
My guess is that his answer will be less than 10 words, with no capitals.
Mosher is a waste of carbon. Haven’t heard anything sensible out of him since Moses was a boy.
To his credit, Steve M. does take a very dim view of the ways of Mann and the other climate clowns.
If Jinan Cao is right, GHGs enable atmospheric cooling by facilitating hi-altitude radiation to space. Hence the diving RSS curve.
And the failing alarmist models.