Looks like alarmists have a little bit of catching up to do. 188 record minimums and 13 record maximums so far in 2014.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
Looks like a hockey stick to me….
Beat me to it. 😀
Whadda ya know, another hockey stick.
What was the ratio last year?
Last year was 1.15
First time since 1993.
2004 1997 1996
Looks like a sine wave. Colder in the 1900’s, warmer in the 30’s, cold through to the 70’s and warmer up to 2000. Likely to be cooler over next two to three decades, if we followed the wave, and don’t follow Warmist prophets of doom.
If you inverted the ratio how high would 2012 have been? Was it over 15:1?
Obviously needs adjusting.
If that data was in the BEST dataset it would be identified as a ‘breakpoint’ and thrown out due to ‘regional differences’.
2004 1997 1996
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/for-first-time-in-20-years-cold-records-may-beat-warm-in-u.s-16790
I guess it depends on what data set you’re looking at.
Climate Central uses a database heavily loaded with stations which were not in existence during the hot 1930’s and 1950’s. That allows them to slime their readers with misinformation.
Interesting how you can see the ~60 year cycle in Steve’s graph.