Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
How can you take real data over the NRDC’s onearth publication? I love the NRDC asking people to bet on something happening 66 years from now. Most folks placing that bet won’t be around to collect or pay up. Isn’t some sort of flaw in a theory that can’t be falsified?
Those darn anomalies are a roar 😉
http://www.lawrencevilleweather.com/conditions/north-asia
Being 160 square kilometers below the peak 1979 planetary ice mass should be quite discouraging for the scheming, lying and downright disgusting warmist’s, even while using their own corrupt data…
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.antarctic.png
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.arctic.png
If the Ruskis let off 4 hiroshima bombs a second, following Mann’s recomendation, perhaps they’d be able to warm the place up a bit. I don’t know what they should do after they run out of bombs sometime tomorrow.
&! That was said, by a “RESPECTED” scientist!
What is the real temperature? This a temperature anomaly map. I’m not arguing, mind you, just curious. If the anomaly is -10degC but the temp is still above 0degC… well, I would worry about there not being any snow, in all honestly. Don’t get me wrong, it is the middle of winter, but I have seen maps that suggest Siberia and Europe are not actually this cold.
The temperatures for Moscow are currently listed as -19 degrees Celsius (-3 Fahrenheit) falling to -22C overnight, and forecast to rise to a balmy -14C tomorrow afternoon.
The NOAA surface mean temperature map for today (30th Jan) shows it dropping to the -20’s C and below -30C the farther east into Siberia you go.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/images/fnl/sfctmp_01.fnl.gif