Several incumbent Democratic senators facing tough re-election bids this fall are calling on the Internal Revenue Service to be more aggressive in regulating the political activities of tax-exempt groups that are expected to spend millions of dollars on their races this year.
Vulnerable Democrats urge IRS to step up scrutiny of tax-exempt groups | Fox News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
Reblogged this on BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN ! and commented:
GYG!
Non-profits not only do not make a profit (“taxable income”) but they don’t even “make” money. They spend it. They spend other peoples money to promote those peoples sense of social justness. So the gubment wants to tax 1st amendment protected free speech. Ahhh, ok…
tanstaafl! (I’m pretty sure anyone withe the nom de plume of John Galt must know that–“there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch!”) If they think they can get away with making you pay rent on your own body (the Obamacare mandate), why shouldn’t they go after your speech? (“You are so pleasantly naive, m’sieur, so droll. These are the way things are done, no? You give, we take; it is the law of life–how you say, realité–is it not? Come on, come on, hand it over bub, or we use the brass knuckles on youse.”)
Can’t let the people have their say after all! They must be subverted in order for the wise democrats to lead us to our new Eden!
Don’t forget the Anti-Occupy Law!
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/leading-edge-legal-advice-everyday-matters/2012/aug/1/i-object-i-disagree-can-i-now-say-so-publicly/
You could probably get all sides to “Kick the B@$T@RDS out” based on all but three Congress Critters voted to restrict our right of protest.
(Make a good T-shirt with the name of the three who voted NO on it.)
This was to be expected after the LIar-in-chief stated that as far as he was concerned ther is/was no IRS scandal.
What a maroon.