Several incumbent Democratic senators facing tough re-election bids this fall are calling on the Internal Revenue Service to be more aggressive in regulating the political activities of tax-exempt groups that are expected to spend millions of dollars on their races this year.
Vulnerable Democrats urge IRS to step up scrutiny of tax-exempt groups | Fox News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
Reblogged this on BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN ! and commented:
GYG!
Non-profits not only do not make a profit (“taxable income”) but they don’t even “make” money. They spend it. They spend other peoples money to promote those peoples sense of social justness. So the gubment wants to tax 1st amendment protected free speech. Ahhh, ok…
tanstaafl! (I’m pretty sure anyone withe the nom de plume of John Galt must know that–“there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch!”) If they think they can get away with making you pay rent on your own body (the Obamacare mandate), why shouldn’t they go after your speech? (“You are so pleasantly naive, m’sieur, so droll. These are the way things are done, no? You give, we take; it is the law of life–how you say, realité–is it not? Come on, come on, hand it over bub, or we use the brass knuckles on youse.”)
Can’t let the people have their say after all! They must be subverted in order for the wise democrats to lead us to our new Eden!
Don’t forget the Anti-Occupy Law!
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/leading-edge-legal-advice-everyday-matters/2012/aug/1/i-object-i-disagree-can-i-now-say-so-publicly/
You could probably get all sides to “Kick the B@$T@RDS out” based on all but three Congress Critters voted to restrict our right of protest.
(Make a good T-shirt with the name of the three who voted NO on it.)
This was to be expected after the LIar-in-chief stated that as far as he was concerned ther is/was no IRS scandal.
What a maroon.