In February 1977, experts hoped that the cold winter in the US would convince government to take action against global cooling
The winter of 1977 was very similar to this winter. Snow in Florida and warm in Alaska
Same polar vortex as 2014
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
Current leaders of the United Nations and the world scientific community use science as a disguise to control people with false information.
Real scientist would address the three figures of precise experimental data that falsified their “settled scientific” conclusions on the force that powers the Sun and sustains our lives [See Figures 1-3, pages 19-27 of Chapter 2].
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf
What else is the same is that both 1977 and 2014 are several years into a cold PDO cycle.
Also a weak solar cycle though this one is more similar to the Dalton minimum than solar cycle 20. We are also closer to the end of the Holocene and much colder than when the little ice age started in the 1300s. So what could possibly go wrong with a huge population and limited ability to grow food.
You mean ” .. what could possible NOT go wrong …” with the present mindset of political “leaders”.
Your point about “closer to the end of the Holocene” is escaping the analysis of “97%” of the analyses everywhere. People think in terms of global for “space” and forget the long term trends in “time”, of which the progression of the Holocene is probably the most important.
Same “forcings” displaced in time towards the end of the interglacial necessarily have different results. The atmosphere is drier now, Earth’s magnetic field is weaker and we’re just starting another Bond cycle, etc.
Its why I have 2-3 months of canned goods. 100 pounds of beans and 100 pounds of rice and 3 months of freeze dried in the house. You don’t have to be faster than the bear just faster than the average American boobicanis
I wouldn’t announce that publicly even to friends and neighbors. When SHTF conditions occur you may be engaged in a shooting war trying to defend your right to keep it and your life. However, be sure you have the water and means to cook it with no utilities available, as well as the ability to decisively defend it.
“February 2014 : Experts Hoped The Cold US Winter Would Convince Government To Take Action Against Global Warming”
Only the warmists don’t see how stupid they’re starting to look for the entire world.
This is interesting. 1981 Hansen: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2012/04/evaluating-a-1981-temperature-projection/
Steve G. I have several comments still in moderation since yesterday in the Just Hit The NOAA Motherlode thread addressing citizenschallenge’s idiocy.
They give a lot of the scientific background for the sun/solar wind/polar wind (loss of atmosphere) Jet stream connections and what we are seeing happening now.
Trying to find information is a real pain because scientists esp. at NASA tippy toe around the sun’s variability and its effect on climate.
The Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray/ UV ====> changes in ozone ====> changes in the jet stream at the poles is known but not talked about in Politically Correct company it seems. (I was going to say polite but they are the opposite of polite.)
If you have a ton of links, I think posts get automatically tossed into a moderation heap. And I am not sure Dorthy’s pup knows where those moderation buttons are….. I had one post like that many moons ago……
I am aware links cause WordPress to toss the comment into the snow pile. That is why I am alerting Steve he might want to get a snow shovel and start digging.
It is also why I now use the title and author instead of a link but with citizenschallenge’s level of understanding I thought I better provide the links.
It seems that you can give two links.
Anything more than 2, and your comment gets tossed into the void. I’m not absolutely sure about that 2 number, 2 just seems to work, while more than that, it needs “testing” so someone can provide the exact answer.
If you are over your link limit, you could say “dot com” as an alternative. For example, I think wuwt’s weekly climate news roundup is not given enough attention for all the good it gives. We’ll see if this causes any issues: I could say go to wattsupwiththat dot com + /2014/02/02/weekly-climate-and-energy-news-roundup-122/
In 1977 the world scientific community did not recognise this sign of future global warming. They wanted governments to prepare for the wrong stuff. How could it be that they made such a huge mistake.
Of course they could not know that the 1930’s warming was hiding in the deep oceans.
“We are on the brink of disaster. Urgent action by the government is needed.” -Econuts and Democrats, 1960s
“We are on the brink of disaster. Urgent action by the government is needed.” -Econuts and Democrats, 1970s
“We are on the brink of disaster. Urgent action by the government is needed.” -Econuts and Democrats, 1980s
“We are on the brink of disaster. Urgent action by the government is needed.” -Econuts and Democrats, 1990s
“We are on the brink of disaster. Urgent action by the government is needed.” -Econuts and Democrats, 2000s
“We are on the brink of disaster. Urgent action by the government is needed.” -Econuts and Democrats, 2010s
Don’t just do something, stand there!