COI | Centre for Ocean and Ice | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Allan Shelton on NASA Sea Level
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Ulric Lyons on Technology Advances
- oeman50 on NASA Sea Level
- Gordon Vigurs on NASA Sea Level
- Lasse on NASA Sea Level
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
Do I understand this correctly. I have followed the link and see the graph there.
So they publish a graph that says that the ice lost 2.5m sq km overnight and then regained it overnight the next night ?
And they expect to be taken seriously , and do not correct or notate this oddity ?
This is not the first data lapse with that chart. I think it was noted twice last year here. My suspicion is that Steve left off the SARC tag while poking fun at the website. It is probably the most reliable site for Arctic ice charts out there.
The graphic above accurately represents what is on the website, per clicking the provided link.
I can understand a lapse. That might not be the best way to represent it, however,
and is not accompanied by any note or explanation .
Did someone bump something?
Overnight shift operator/intern “hmmmmm wonder what this button does . . .?”
Morning shift Operator “we gotta stop this underpaid intern crap stuff . . . click-click”
did you notice the word “estimates”…? Another tell-tale for a BS alert.
They have an explanation on this link —
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php
“The plot above replaces an earlier sea ice extent plot, that was based on data with the coastal zones masked out. This coastal mask implied that the previous sea ice extent estimates were underestimated. The new plot displays absolute sea ice extent estimates. The old plot can still be viewed here for a while.”
That explanation has been up since last year and can not explain what just happen.
(I frequently look at that site.)
This is hardly something to get worked up over, it was an error, they corrected it. There is enough deceit from the climate terrorists without having to go looking for something.
Last year, when it became painfully obvious that the “Death Spiral” was a bunch of bologna, we changed our methodology so we could just wave our hands every time someone pointed out a discrepancy & pretend we were right all along.