Climate experts talk about returning to 350 PPM or 300 PPM CO2.
That is cowardly. The only way to make America completely safe from bad weather is to return to 0 PPM.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Quadrupled Border Crossings
- “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Hottest Day Ever
- Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Same Weather As Always
- “Climate Change Is Killing People”
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Miami Drowning
- Blocked By Ice
- Will He Be Disappointed?
- Don’t Be A Conspiracy Theorist
- Washington Post Spy Analyst
- Summer Heat And Burn Area
- Climate Heresy
- “I do not want to hear about the 1930s”
- “33 storms”
- Something New In North Dakota
- Survival Of The Planet
- “baseless far-right conspiracy theory”
- The BBC
- Biden Uniting America
- Firearms Safety Rules For Actors
- Science Banned In France
- Global Warming in Nevada
- Saving The Climate With Soy
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- arn on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Gamecock on Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Luigi on Hottest Day Ever
- Disillusioned on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on Hottest Day Ever
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- arn on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
“One of these days your sense of humor is going to get you in trouble!”
Or is it that we have we reached Peak Stupid? They are selling the invisible, natural, harm-reducing gas called CO2 as a visible smog “pollution”. This is deeply stupid. And yes CO2 is harm-reducing because it sustains all the carbon-based life on this planet, and at only 400 parts per million parts in the air we breath, it is currently at levels that only just sustains that life. Surely only the stupid could believe atmospheric CO2 is harmful?
“CAGW-Climate change” offers an amorphous and specious concept that can be molded to fit the particular catastrophic forecast that politicians want to frighten us with. “Climate change” has proved to be a powerful tool and persuader to the ill-informed. With “CAGW-Climate change” we get consensus, Gore-style: a consensus forged by the UN, governments, and government funded academia offering censorship, intimidation, and deceit behind a flimsy illusion of scientific rigor. Hockey sticks and emails have shown evidence of that.
It is indeed a fact that “climate change” has NO acceptable definition, and thus it has resulted in it being enthusiastically embraced by those officials that seek to control us. They seek to control your children and grandchildren.
So yes there is a big chance of rain, storm, and drought, and there is the chance that big government and the big money paymasters will end up controlling every tiny part of your life so that the guilt-ridden can ‘save the world’. That is what is putting ‘future generations’ in jeopardy.
Peak Stupid.
Full exemplification of the Dunning-Kruger effect seen cross-specialization in the ‘sciences’ even (esp ‘cli sci’) …
Yep Jim that is the way I see it.
Government funded pseudo-scientific crud and hokum from my taxes.
Do these idiots ever look at history…
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html
Scroll down to the chart titled “Global Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 over Geologic Time.”
There never has been stable weather or a “safe” climate.
ROTFLMAO
Hey this is fun. Take the current CO2 level of 400 ppm and calculate how many time we have to double it to be like Venus. Venus has 950,000 ppm and is 90 times denser than us so it has 85,000,000 compared to our 400. Let’s start doubling:
800
1600
3200
6400
12800
25600
51200
102400
204800
409600
820000
1640000
3280000
6560000
13120000
26240000
52480000
That’s 17 doublings to be like Venus. But the climate sensitivity is only 1.2 degrees per doubling according to Lindzen so 7 doublings is only 20 degrees warmer.
So, according to the greenhouse effect theory, Venus is 20 degrees warmer than earth.
I’m surprised nobody commented my this post, because it totally debunks Jim Hansen’s entires runaway greenhouse Venus delusion once and for all.
No comment? Sheesh!
Ok, I’ll comment …
The so called “climate sensitivity to CO2” is exactly, and precisely ZERO
Nuff said…
re: Morgan says May 6, 2014 at 12:41 pm
… No comment? Sheesh!
Well, it did appear to bring out an apparent ‘crank’ (squid2112) …
.
You also get band broadening at higher pressures, so that the CO2 absorption spectra essentially covers all frequencies.
The US wants Australia to follow it to zero ppm CO2.
Or else!!!
http://m.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/breaking-news/us-urges-closer-ties-on-climate-change/story-fni0xqi3-1226906292654