Wilsons Promonotory is the southernmost point in Victoria. Satellites show that there has been no warming there since the start of records in 1978.
ftp://ftp.remss.com/msu/data/netcdf/RSS_Tb_Anom_Maps_ch_TLT_V3_3.nc
As of 2012, GISS showed no warming since the start of records in 1880.
But since 2012, Gavin and Tom have added a spectacular hockey stick of post 1978 (satellite era) warming.
The animation below shows their spectacularly fraudulent manipulations of the surface temperature data at Wilson’s Promontory.
This warming does not exist. The fraudsters at NASA and NOAA simply made it up.
and this week in Aus?
we have a mongrel bragging he got the enquiry into BoM fraud stymied.
christopher pyne
then they remove Maurice Newman
http://www.smh.com.au/business/cbd/tony-abbotts-legacy-turnbulls-timing-perfect-as-maurice-newman-about-to-exit-20150914-gjmlx0.html
Maurice Newman dumped.
and then THE TOPPER
this 2faced lying POS! who backstabbed Tony Abbot and is so smug has…
done this
sold Aus off to the fn eu scum!
http://pickeringpost.com/story/-julie-quickly-into-bed-with-un-warmists/5377
Why all the missing data in the temperature record? Here in the 21st Century, with global warming supposedly the worst problem facing humanity, we can’t maintain a constant temperauture record in a supposedly modern country?
But then we are told that satellite data is no good either. Something stinks to high heaven. Only “climate scientists” with red and brown crayons are allowed to give us great unwashed the real truth. And that “real truth” somehow always fits their hockey stick and multibillion dollar global warming scam. How convenient!
And where did they find the missing readings between 2012 & 2015 and only to lose some back in the 1960’s & 1970’s?
Where is that sat data you show from? As in, can anyone check it?
Perhaps you did not notice the FTP link to the data immediately following the graph.
It wasn’t there when I asked! I swear it.
Thanks Steve
It is certainly the biggest racket ever and it’s about time the police were called in to stop it.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
U N B E L I E V A B L E.
Though 110% understandable when you have a global warming agenda to prosecute.
And then they name-call anyone sceptical of this data manipulation, as “deniers” of science !?
tony,do you ever send any of your stuff to official government department and ask for a response. here in the uk our local member of parliament is obliged to ask questions on their constituents behalf and are required to provide answers.
Attached is a link to a recent paper issued by the BOM on its capabilities and asking for funding.
While overall staffing is fairy constant, the skills have diminished, as the remote observation staff has halved since 1990.
“The Bureau employs around 500 staff who are in roles classified as meteorologists. However, many of these roles are filled by staff with professional qualifications other than meteorology and cannot perform the duties of an operational meteorologist. An operational meteorologist is defined as a person who has successfully completed the Graduate Diploma of Meteorology”
Warning Bells anyone??
And they wonder why their data adjustments have been called into question.
https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDEQFjAEahUKEwjRgtfXuZ7IAhXJn5QKHaw5D4w&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.environment.gov.au%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2Fresources%2Fbc0cc118-a6f2-496c-82fd-0b092c4cc7a5%2Ffiles%2Fbom-review.docx&usg=AFQjCNGIHSwb9DtqZnSX-a1y6BsVgNLhYQ&bvm=bv.103627116,d.dGo
If Engineering companies tried this and something failed, there would be hell to pay.
What does the BOM get after they’ve been busted data tampering? A government coverup.
That is why most of the staff at BOM is now bureaucrats and not operational meteorologists.
+1 and bureaucrats are politicians in training.
The problem with constant government cover=ups is eventually you provoke Defenestration:
https://media3.giphy.com/media/E0K7jDx5GQFWM/200_s.gif
https://i2.wp.com/s1.hubimg.com/u/6837072_f520.jpg
“A rendition of the Defenestration of Prague. The manure pile is not featured.”