A Closer Look At GISS Temperature Fraud

NASA has massively altered their global temperature data over the past 15 years, to double global warming.

GISS2001_2015

2001 version : Fig.A.ps
2015 version: Fig.A.gif 

The next graph shows the two at the same scale, normalized to the 1880’s. This graph is the best way to view the change since 2001 in claimed global warming.

2015-12-07-05-47-37

The data tampering algorithm they are using is largely just a linear scaling. If the 2001 version is scaled up linearly by 30% along the Y-axis, we get a fairly good match from 1890-2000.

2015-12-07-06-04-39

The next graph shows that the data has been tampered with by almost 0.6C over the past 15 years.

2015-12-07-06-43-38

2001 version : FigA.txt
2015 version : Fig.A.txt

After altering the data by 0.6C, the criminals at GISS claimed a global temperature record by 0.01C

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to A Closer Look At GISS Temperature Fraud

  1. SMS says:

    All the corrections either cool the past and warm the present. But the correction that is not taken into account by our anointed climate scientists is UHI. Once UHI is correctly accounted for, there is little or no warming in the past century. The IPCC, NOAA, GISS and others acknowledge natural warming following the Little Ice Age. What is that natural warming? They have so fouled up the data record that what we have now is totally useless.

    If we were ever to go into another ice age our political leaders would keep us from developing coal, oil and nuclear believing that the temperature record provided by NOAA was telling them we were still warmer than normal. Imagine the world covered in an ice sheet and Obama telling us there is nothing to worry about. Oops! sounds like last night.

  2. Mac says:

    I have a question: where are all the rabid climate change cultists when a graph such as this is presented? The proof of these altered temperatures is indisputable. Where are all those paranoid and silly people claiming (again) that it’s all a plot by Exxon and the Koch brothers? NASA is obviously committing fraud. How come the usual comical and hysterical accusations are nowhere to be found every time graphs such as these are presented?

  3. oeman50 says:

    0.01C? I’m melting!!

  4. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    The big dip before 1900 in the ‘adjustments’ is a tell, since the 60 year cycle peaked in the late 1870’s and had its next trough in about 1905 – which is when the IPCC start their magic century.

    The problem for GISS is the IPCC century has 0.74 C rise but if you start in 1880 the total rise then is only about 0.5 C in 120 years…because 2 full cycles are included.

    So they have edited out the inconvenient peak.

    Here is a graph of HadCRUT 3v which has been detrended so you can see the cycle more clearly. Without detrending it looks like this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.