The Guardian drowned Tokyo in 1936
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
D-Link doesn’t let me read this message.
Just for clarity, this is not the Guardian to which we usually refer, correct?
Same one
In 1936 it was known as “The Manchester Guardian”.
Boulder?
So Climate Change in the 30’s resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor!
Wenzhuan Tibet Maybe?
Altitude 16,730 feet above sea level.
The Guardian hasn’t drowned my home town, yet. I feel left out.
I keep hearing the news refer to “record flooding” along the Mississippi from St. Louis down through Missouri. Though I have not checked I suspect that the records being set are local and not general because I remember at least a couple times before when there was worse flooding in the same areas. The great flood of 1993 was much more extensive.
The one in 1972? wasn’t anything to sneeze at either.