The Guardian drowned Tokyo in 1936
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
Recent Comments
- GW on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Robertvd on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Paul Homewood on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- arn on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Bob G on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- arn on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Independent on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Mac on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- conrad ziefle on Latest Climate News
- Jack the Insider on Latest Climate News
D-Link doesn’t let me read this message.
Just for clarity, this is not the Guardian to which we usually refer, correct?
Same one
In 1936 it was known as “The Manchester Guardian”.
Boulder?
So Climate Change in the 30’s resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor!
Wenzhuan Tibet Maybe?
Altitude 16,730 feet above sea level.
The Guardian hasn’t drowned my home town, yet. I feel left out.
I keep hearing the news refer to “record flooding” along the Mississippi from St. Louis down through Missouri. Though I have not checked I suspect that the records being set are local and not general because I remember at least a couple times before when there was worse flooding in the same areas. The great flood of 1993 was much more extensive.
The one in 1972? wasn’t anything to sneeze at either.