The Guardian drowned Tokyo in 1936
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dearieme on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mike Peinsipp on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mac on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- mwhite on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Denis Rushworth on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- D. Boss on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
D-Link doesn’t let me read this message.
Just for clarity, this is not the Guardian to which we usually refer, correct?
Same one
In 1936 it was known as “The Manchester Guardian”.
Boulder?
So Climate Change in the 30’s resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor!
Wenzhuan Tibet Maybe?
Altitude 16,730 feet above sea level.
The Guardian hasn’t drowned my home town, yet. I feel left out.
I keep hearing the news refer to “record flooding” along the Mississippi from St. Louis down through Missouri. Though I have not checked I suspect that the records being set are local and not general because I remember at least a couple times before when there was worse flooding in the same areas. The great flood of 1993 was much more extensive.
The one in 1972? wasn’t anything to sneeze at either.