The Guardian drowned Tokyo in 1936
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
D-Link doesn’t let me read this message.
Just for clarity, this is not the Guardian to which we usually refer, correct?
Same one
In 1936 it was known as “The Manchester Guardian”.
Boulder?
So Climate Change in the 30’s resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor!
Wenzhuan Tibet Maybe?
Altitude 16,730 feet above sea level.
The Guardian hasn’t drowned my home town, yet. I feel left out.
I keep hearing the news refer to “record flooding” along the Mississippi from St. Louis down through Missouri. Though I have not checked I suspect that the records being set are local and not general because I remember at least a couple times before when there was worse flooding in the same areas. The great flood of 1993 was much more extensive.
The one in 1972? wasn’t anything to sneeze at either.