The Paris Agreement Is Based On Fraudulent Data

The Paris agreement is based on fraudulent temperature graphs, like this one from CRU which shows more than 1C warming in the Northern Hemisphere over the last century.


HadCRUT4.png (630×728)

Compare that to this National Geographic graph from 1976, based on National Academy of Sciences and NOAA temperatures. It showed no net warming from 1890 to 1976, and a sharp decline after 1940 “halfway back to the chill of the Little Ice Age”


National Geographic : 1976 Nov, Page 614

The next graph overlays the two at the same scale. Note how the right side of the graph lines up very well, but government climate criminals posing as scientists knocked half a degree off pre-1960 temperatures, and erased the post-1940 cooling.


Phil Jones is in charge of this data at CRU, and Climategate E-mails show that he and other government climate scientists conspired to remove “the 1940’s blip”

From: Tom Wigley <[email protected]>
To: Phil Jones <[email protected]>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <[email protected]>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise… Can you also email Gene [Wahl] and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address. We will be getting Caspar [Ammann] to do likewise.
Cheers, Phil

The entire Paris agreement is based on fraudulent data from NOAA, NASA and CRU. Global warming is the biggest scam in history.

Here are a few more gems from the 1976 National Geographic article.

Glaciers disappearing before 1956


It was one or two degrees warmer 8,000 years ago.


Earth’s climate has always been changing


About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to The Paris Agreement Is Based On Fraudulent Data

  1. Marsh says:

    COP21 is the biggest Scamfest of the Century ; of course its foundation rests on fraudulent data.
    Reminds me of the Volkswagen Diesel emissions Scam ; people can be so naive and gullible… It was stripped of “Green Car Of Year” award,, yet the Car, was more credible than the NOAA..!

  2. Every one of those idiots has a worn-out Che Guevara tee shirt in his closet and a poster of the funniest of the 6 Marx Brothers on his wall

  3. rah says:

    They are saying the “agreement” is “legally binding”. Wanna bet that turns out to be a flat out lie?

    • David A says:

      Rah, see Keith D post about this. The agreed to agree in the future.

    • Ted says:

      There’s not the slightest chance of it getting 67 votes in the senate. Obama can pretend it’s binding, but it certainly won’t be legal.

      Of course, Obammy now claims the authority to unilaterally execute American citizens, without trial, based on accusations, evidence, and LAWS, that are all illegal for any of us to ever know, in direct opposition to both the letter, and the universally acknowledged intent, of the fifth and sixth amendments. Just a few weeks ago, yet another appeals court ruled that those SECRET LAWS allowing summary executions are entirely constitutional, and that we have no right to even know which actions are now considered capital offenses. Our government has all but given up on pretending that it’s bound the rule of law. They now ascribe only to the rule of Ash:

      • Jason Calley says:

        As for the rule of law, yes, it is no longer in effect. For example, there are major statements from various politicians now that anyone on the “No Fly List” will lose their 2nd Amendment Rights. What do you have to do to be on the “No Fly List”? No one quite knows. How do you check to see if you are on it? No one quite knows. How do you get off? No one quite knows. Who can put you on it? No one quite knows. Is there any sort of charges or trail? Ah, at last a question that we can answer. NO. You don’t have to break any laws, and you do not have a chance to defend yourself. Basically, someone somewhere says you are dangerous and your supposed rights disappear.

        Can anyone say “banana republic”?

        • Marsh says:

          Jason ; so true, one’s personal rights are being stripped away by stealth. Your statement should go across every form of media ; the United States is becoming very un-American.

  4. desotojohn says:

    For this president, the ends justify the means. Lies mean nothing if it helps achieve his goals.

  5. gator69 says:

    All leftists should be forced to change their email addresses to [email protected].

  6. IPCC AR5 Figure 6.1 displays the global carbon stores and fluxes before, during, and after 1750 through 2011, the increase following the Keeling hockey blade. The amount of anthropogenic carbon added between 1750 and 2011 is twice the Keeling curve increase. How embarrassing. So exactly 57%, not 50% or 60%, is sequestered by never before existing sinking processes in the ocean and vegetation to exactly create and match the 43% net anthropogenic sources. This is akin to the mobster who hides his proceeds from gambling, drugs, and prostitution in used car lots, horse racing, and spas.

    Why waste time and effort disputing ice caps, sea ice, sea levels, extreme weather, S-B back radiation, and thermodynamics when CAGW falls apart on its indefensible mass and heat balances?

  7. OrganicFool says:

    By definition a racket, solving a problem that doesn’t exist, extort money from the victims.

    Maybe they should be given mob names like Baby face Barry? Lucky “the Boss” Gore? John “the Falcon” Kerry? James Mugsy Hansen? Kinda has a ring to it!

  8. AndyG55 says:

    ““to achieve a balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in the second half of this century”.”

    Puts Australia in a nice situation…

    We are already a net carbon sink.

  9. gator69 says:

    “It’s a fraud really, a fake,” he says, rubbing his head. “It’s just bullshit for them to say: ‘We’ll have a 2C warming target and then try to do a little better every five years.’ It’s just worthless words. There is no action, just promises. As long as fossil fuels appear to be the cheapest fuels out there, they will be continued to be burned.”

    The talks, intended to reach a new global deal on cutting carbon emissions beyond 2020, have spent much time and energy on two major issues: whether the world should aim to contain the temperature rise to 1.5C or 2C above preindustrial levels, and how much funding should be doled out by wealthy countries to developing nations that risk being swamped by rising seas and bashed by escalating extreme weather events.

    But, according to Hansen, the international jamboree is pointless unless greenhouse gas emissions aren’t taxed across the board. He argues that only this will force down emissions quickly enough to avoid the worst ravages of climate change.

    COP21 won’t save the planet, we are all doomed, and the poley bear delegates are beside themselves with grief.

    Sacré bleu.

    • rah says:

      They need to go up north and meet their buddies up close and personal and I’m not talking about any polar bear SUV bus tour either. I mean at ground level face to face, that is while they still had one.

  10. rah says:

    “This is huge,” tweeted U.S. President Barack Obama. “Almost every country in the world just signed on to the #ParisAgreement on climate change — thanks to American leadership.”

    I say:

  11. omanuel says:

    The UN’s COP-21 Agreement has no “teeth” because world leaders belatedly realized they could be charged and convicted for TREASON if they signed binding agreements to surrender the control of their nation to the UN, . . .

    based on lies about Earth’s heat source – the Sun – they had financed with public funds for seventy years (1945-2015). See: “Solar energy”

    • omanuel says:

      I did not post a link to the manuscript, “Solar energy,” out of respect for our host.

      That manuscript, and a brief summary of unreported events at Konan, Korea that changed the course of world history in AUG-SEPT 1945, “Stalin’s Science” – were both posted on ResearchGate and read by thousands of other scientists before my account on ResearchGate was locked when the UN’s COP-21 Conference strated in Paris.

      But “the cat was out of the bag” and world leaders realized that they might be held accountable.

    • rah says:

      Omanuel it was obviously formulated to have not teeth other than the additional worthless bureaucracy it creates which the citizens will have to pay for. How can anything that bases it’s goals on naturally variable temperatures mean anything or be considered to have anything to do with science? It is nothing but pure unadulterated merda and anyone with an ounce of sense knows it.

  12. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    “He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”

    ? George Orwell, 1984

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *