It turns out that NASA data tampering is the cause of El Nino.
Nasa say El Niño should start to disappear but global warming could change that
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Russell Cook on The End Of Polar Bears
- Russell Cook on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Allan Shelton on Scientist Kamala Harris
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
- czechlist on HUD Climate Advisor
- Scott Allen on Ellen Flees To The UK
- GeologyJim on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Patrick Powers on Ellen Flees To The UK
- toorightmate on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- toorightmate on Ellen Flees To The UK
NASA? What does El Nino have to do with Muslim Outreach?
Of course as we have seen, nothing can falsify their hypothesis. But they have continually put great stock in claiming that temperatures will rise and not go back down much after this El Nino ends. Starting years before the El Nino Modoki which preceded this El Nino Joe Bastardi was saying that this would be the test of the AGW hypothesis. If we have a significant La Nina and temperatures do not stay at a higher level then as far as he’s concerned the alarmists have no case.
It is typical, now that this El Nino has apparently peaked and the time begins to approach when their previous claims about what would happen comes closer,they start equivocating. Where before a lot of them were saying that temperatures would remain at a higher level after this El Nino and there would be, we are seeing them now say “anything could happen”.
When they say “anything can happen” it’s a win win for them. Anything that does happen can now be blamed on “climate change”.
Never mentioned is actual climate change: The incremental drop in insolation that is slowly returning earth’s climate back toward its more stable cold phase. Eventually (without a possible catastrophic acceleration) a mid millennial “little ice age” becomes a full glacial when the solar peak at the end of a millennium is insufficient to melt the ice.
And so we will have to wait and see what solar cycle 25 has in store for us. But if NASAs initial prediction is correct we’re more than likely in for some very cold times.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/01/25/first-estimate-of-solar-cycle-25-amplitudesmallest-in-over-300-years/
Cycle 24 should end around 2020 to 2021 (11 to 12 years from January 2009 start) However it is not exactly lively right now.
Solar Cycle 24: (H/T REN)
https://i2.wp.com/www.sidc.be/images/wolfjmms.png
https://i1.wp.com/www.sidc.be/images/wnosuf.png
https://i2.wp.com/www.solen.info/solar/images/cycle24.png
………………………
Comparison of cycles 12,13,14,16 and 24 L.S. ‘adjusted’ series (H/T oldbrew)
https://i2.wp.com/www.solen.info/solar/images/comparison_similar_cycles.png
https://i1.wp.com/commdiginews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SILSOv2_Progression_New_vs_Old_800_482.png
Seems “climate change started snowfall changes in Antarctica around 1900 !!
https://eos.org/research-spotlights/climate-change-drives-increasing-snowfall-in-western-antarctica
http://frenchtribune.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/article/dental-plans-child.jpg
This is science? Are they nuts? [T]he dramatic increase in snowfall means a glacier is GROWING unless there is something else happening… LIKE GEOTHERMAL HEAT AND VOLCANOES melting the glacier from underneath and putting it on a fast track into the sea. (2014)
And yes I pointed that study out in the comments.
It will be interesting to see if Eos approves this or censors it.
So far it has not been approved.
LOL! NASA says “global warming means ‘anything could happen'”. That is the first accurate thing I have heard NASA say about “global warming”. There is a reason why I almost always refer to it as CAGW, “catastrophic anthropogenic global warming”. Why because none of the alarmist can agree on what global warming is; it might make us cold, it might make us hot, it might make us dry, it might make us wet, it might make it stormy or on the other hand the annual monsoons might stop… The ONLY things they agree on is that we humans have caused it and it is going to be CATASTROPHIC!
It is embarrassing to see grown ups embrace such nebulous quackery as CAGW.
http://watchmen-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Up-to-our-ears-in-Al-Gore’s-‘climate-change’-snake-oil-610×400.jpg
Many of the same people who think that carbon offsets are a good idea will tell you that the Catholic Church was a chump scam during the Middle Ages because they sold absolution from sins.
I see a similarity in what you MEANT to say but just for the record may I clear up one thing? Whatever simony took place at any time in the past regarding the SELLING OF INDULGENCES had NOTHING to do with absolution from sins. NEVER has there been a charge for abolution. ABSOLUTELY. What went on, and it was deplorable, was the SELLING OF INDULGENCES, an indulgence being the TEMPORAL REMISSION OF PUNISHMENT DUE TO SINS. When we sin we have hurt ourselves and/or others as well as offended the infinite goodness of God. Pretend for a moment that you committed a sin: you deliberately lied about global warming and collected carbon offset fees. You realized it was a scam, confessed the sin, were forgiven, but there is still harm done that has to be dealt with. (Agreed?) An indulgence helps with that. Prayers, penance, pilgrimages, almsgiving, etc. are sources for indulgences. No money changes hands, except for the alms, at least shouldn’t have. The penitent just did the good deeds. Some corrupt clerics (and probably politicians) decided to get in on this gravy train and charged money for these indulgences. This came to an end some time ago. Indulgences are still possible to attain, such as during this Year of Mercy, but only by doing specified actions. No charge.
Please note this and do not intentionally mistake the words “indulgence” and “absolution” again. If you need a lesson on the difference between the Immaculate Conception and the Virgin Birth give me a ring. 😉
Hey kmbold! One of the things that I like about this site is that I often get to read things by people who know more than I do. Thanks! You make some very good points and what you say is a real help in clarifying the subject. I will try to be more accurate in the future. Thanks for taking the time to help me out about this!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ogyip4TSis
Though some seem to have answers for every question/fact happening in our world, others keep asking questions and making research. Maybe a comparison between two different winters with strong El Nino events will help us understand some issues: http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/12/arch/11.html.
Alarmist BS means that “any kind of stupid explanation could happen”, despite what happens after the El Niño