Lost In Space Part 2

More spectacular junk science from former astronaut Piers Sellers

2016-08-18103904

2016-08-18103535

Screen Shot 2016-08-19 at 5.36.21 AM

Space, Climate Change, and the Real Meaning of Theory – The New Yorker

Sellers claims that “straightforward observed facts” tell us that there was a dramatic uptick in warming in the 20th century. But in 1989 ,  NOAA said the exact opposite.

Analysis of warming since 1881 shows most of the increase in global temperature happened before 1919 — before the more recent sharp rise In the amount of  carbon dioxide In the atmosphere. said Thomas Karl. of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center in Asheville. N.C.

While global climate warmed overall since 1891. It actually cooled from 1921 to 1979. Karl said.

7 Dec 1989, Page 14 – at Newspapers.com

Sellers claims that sea level rise and glacial melt is due to humans, which is as dishonest and clueless as a scientist can get. Glaciers have been melting and sea level rising for 20,000 years.

CoaA_7hVMAA0vBA

There is no indication that sea level rise has accelerated over the past 150 years.

8518750 (4)

Sea Level Trends – State Selection

The 1990 IPCC report said that there was no acceleration of sea level rise in the 20th century.

Cb6HecSVAAAugfA

ipcc_far_wg_I_chapter_09.pdf

NASA’s finest people understand that NASA climate science is junk science, but a few charlatans insist on tarnishing the agency’s great accomplishments.

CajoTcXUUAMzylA

NASA Scientists Dispute Climate Change – Business Insider

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Lost In Space Part 2

  1. Gail Combs says:

    The former NASA engineers and scientist got ticked-off enough at watching the sleazy propagandists now at NASA sully THEIR reputation that they undertook …

    One More Mission – The Right Climate Stuff

    ….We, a group of retired and highly experienced engineers and scientists from the Apollo, Skylab, Space Shuttle and International Space Station eras, have volunteered our time and effort conducting an objective, independent assessment of the AGW alarm and reality of the actual threat. We have reviewed hundreds of reports and technical papers relevant to the subject matter, and discussed key issues with experts on both sides of this controversy.

    During our pioneering years in the US manned space program, scientific controversy over complex technical issues was commonplace at numerous times when NASA needed to make critical spacecraft design and operational decisions affecting safety of astronauts. We have unique skills and experience in problem identification, specification, root cause analysis and rational decision-making applicable to public policy decisions related to the AGW concern.

    To aid in monitoring the AGW concern, we have developed our own simple, but rigorous, earth surface temperature model using Conservation of Energy principles, similar to the way we analyze surface and internal temperature of spacecraft. We have validated the model with 165 years of atmospheric GHG data and data on earth surface temperature variations. We have used this model to forecast what we believe will be the maximum, but small and non-harmful effects on earth surface temperature, from continued un-restricted use of fossil fuels….

    http://www.therightclimatestuff.com/

  2. oldbrew says:

    NASA’s climate science: one giant leap backwards for mankind.

  3. Steve Keohane says:

    At first I read ‘Peter’ Sellers, and I’m still not sure Chancey Gardner didn’t write that.

  4. Scott says:

    We have the technology to “see” global warming through our space visors? Cool…….
    Fool

  5. geran says:

    According to wiki, Piers has a doctorate in “biometeorology”. He probably believes he is an engineer and scientist….

  6. Dave N says:

    I’m guessing Sellers doesn’t get invited to Aldrin’s BBQs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *