Thirty Years Of NASA Fake Climate News

In 1988, NASA’s original fake climate scientist predicted a large increase in the number of 90 degree days in DC.

12 Dec 1988, Page 34 – Lansing State Journal

The exact opposite of what Hansen predicted has occurred. The Washington DC area has seen a sharp reduction in the number of hot days since the 1930’s.

Climate alarmists are not scientists. They are political hacks with an agenda to destroy western civilization.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Thirty Years Of NASA Fake Climate News

  1. It’s longer than 30 years. It was 1973 that they intentionally made NASA an environ-mental organisation:

    “NASA realized that it needed to research environmental-atmospheric impacts of the shuttle to defend itself, if necessary, against possible opposition more positively, Fletcher sought to align his agency with environmental values. In 1973, he told congress that NASA should be considered “an environmental agency.” he declared: “everything we do …helps in some practical way to improve the environment of our planet and helps us understand the forces that affect it. Perhaps that is our essential task, to study and understand the earth and its environment.”

    Don’t you realise that when NASA brought in eco-activist Hansen in 1981 to head up Goddard it was part of a well thought out strategy to push environmental alarm to align NASA with environmentalists and to put the arm behind the back of politicians to fund NASA.

    And indeed, where did that “big lie” strategy come from? Which group of goose-stepping fascists did the US bring in to create NASA?

  2. Gail Combs says:

    It was in 1972 that the UN and World Bank, along with the Club of Rome decided to use CAGW as a whip to drive humanity back into serfdom.

    Noel Brown is the former Director of the United Nations Environment Programme, North American Office. He was an organizer of the Stockholm Conference for the Environment in 1972 where Maurce Stong got the ball rolling. Maurice Strong like Noel Brown [was] a member of the Club of Rome, Strong [was] also a Rockefeller Foundation trustee and senior adviser to the World Bank. Both of whom have been involved in CAGW.

    …It is instructive to read Strong’s 1972 Stockholm speech and compare it with the issues of Earth Summit 1992. Strong warned urgently about global warming, the devastation of forests, the loss of biodiversity, polluted oceans, the population time bomb. Then as now, he invited to the conference the brand-new environmental NGOs [non-governmental organizations]: he gave them money to come; they were invited to raise hell at home. After Stockholm, environment issues became part of the administrative framework in Canada, the U.S., Britain, and Europe.
    (wwwDOT)afn.org/~govern/strong.html

    This is interesting because the 1974 CIA report “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems” said:

    … Since 1972 the grain crisis has intensified…. Since 1969 the storage of grain has decreased from 600 million metric tons to less than 100 million metric tons – a 30 day supply… many governments have gone to great lengths to hide their agricultural predicaments from other countries as well as from their own people…

    pg 9

    The archaeologists and climatotologists document a rather grim history… There is considerable evidence that these empires may not have been undone by barbarian invaders but by climatic change…. has tied several of these declines to specific global cool periods, major and minor, that affected global atmospheric circulation and brought wave upon wave of drought to formerly rich agricultural lands.

    Refugees from these collapsing civilizations were often able to migrate to better lands… This would be of little comfort however,… The world is too densely populated and politically divided to accommodate mass migration.

    Page 18 talks of coming glaciation.

    Scientists are confident that unless man is able to effectively modify the climate, the northern regions… will again be covered with 100 to 200 feet of ice and snow. That this will occur within the nexy 2,500 years they are quite positive; that it may occur sooner is open to speculation.

    page 22 states:

    The climate of the 1800s was far less favorable for agriculture in most areas of the world. In the United States during that century, the midwest grain-producing areas were cooler and wetter and snow lines of the Russian steppes lasted for longer periods of time. More extended periods of drought were noted in the areas of the Soviet Union now known as the new lands. More extensive monsoon failures were common around the world, affecting in particular China, the Philippines and the Indian Subcontinent.

    The Wisconsin analysis questions whether a return to these climate conditions could support a population that has grown from 1.1 billion in 1850 to 3.75 billion in 1970. The Wisconsin group predicted that the climate could not support the world’s population since technology offers no immediate solution. Further world grain reserves currently amount to less than one month; thus any delay in supplies implies mass starvation. They also contended that new crop strains could not be developed over night… Moreover they observed that agriculture would become even more energy dependent in a world of declining resources.

    Strong, Holdren and the Malthusians from Stanford University are not alone. The US government has been behind them since BEFORE the book Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions (1973) was published. The book just echoed the real thoughts of the US government of that time.

    Sio the US government has been LYING to the American public since 1972 when it decided to hamstring our economy.

    • Gail Combs says:

      What is really interesting is what happened to the population growth rate after the propaganda campaign.

      YEAR ….. Mid yr pop. ………… growth ….. annual Δ
      1964 ….. 3,263,738,832 ….. 2.00% ….. 65,383,647
      1965 ….. 3,329,122,479 ….. 2.05% ….. 68,352,768
      1966 ….. 3,397,475,247 ….. 2.09% ….. 71,046,477
      1967 ….. 3,468,521,724 ….. 2.11% ….. 73,153,167
      1968 ….. 3,541,674,891 ….. 2.10% ….. 74,433,858
      1969 ….. 3,616,108,749 ….. 2.08% ….. 75,063,867
      1970 ….. 3,691,172,616 ….. 2.05% ….. 75,581,729
      1971 ….. 3,766,754,345 ….. 2.02% ….. 76,119,266
      1972 ….. 3,842,873,611 ….. 1.99% ….. 76,308,721
      1973 ….. 3,919,182,332 ….. 1.94% ….. 76,122,590
      1974 ….. 3,995,304,922 ….. 1.90% ….. 75,715,512
      1975 ….. 4,071,020,434 ….. 1.85% ….. 75,115,416
      1976 ….. 4,146,135,850 ….. 1.80% ….. 74,680,887
      1977 ….. 4,220,816,737 ….. 1.77% ….. 74,848,088

      And now

      YEAR ….. Mid yr pop. ………… growth ….. annual Δ
      2010 ….. 6,916,183,482 ….. 1.18% ….. 81,815,278
      2011 ….. 6,997,998,760 ….. 1.17% ….. 82,073,657
      2012 ….. 7,080,072,417 ….. 1.16% ….. 82,047,017
      2013 ….. 7,162,119,434 ….. 1.14% ….. 81,664,687
      2014 ….. 7,243,784,121 ….. 1.12% ….. 80,998,104
      2015 ….. 7,324,782,225 ….. 1.09% ….. 80,194,558
      2016 ….. 7,404,976,783 ….. 1.07% ….. 79,348,693
      2017 ….. 7,484,325,476 ….. 1.05% ….. 78,434,573

      source: UN, Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2013). World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision.
      note: 1950-2010 are estimates and from 2011-2100 are projected populations in the medium-fertility variant.
      http://www.geohive.com/earth/his_history3.aspx

      • At least in terms of NASA, the most plausible scenario is that after the moonlandings they failed to convince the politicians and public that NASA still merited their absolutely massive budget which they levered out of politicians to get to the Moon.

        There was clearly a military need – but NASA needed a non-military application – which would be so exciting and/or shocking that they could force the public and politicians to continue their massive funding.

        There was only so much “science” you could do in space. So, NASA needed to show that “much needed” science on earth could be done by satellites.

        And what is one of the easiest things to see from a satellite? The seasonal changes of plant growth, long term droughts, floods etc.

        So, NASA deliberately set about a program to feed environmental groups & eco-activist academics with images and data showing “disasters” of various types. They would then feed this “information” to greenspin activists, who would then kick up a fuss and demand “something be done” … and NASA then had the ideal “solution” which was more funding to NASA to do more and more monitoring of the environment.

        So, the environment was a virtual cycle for NASA. They put the satellites up … they get the data back … they feed this FOR FREE to environmental groups, who then could be relied on to create the publicity to force politicians to send even more money to NASA. Likewise, they could do other work in Antarctica.

        I think plain stupid greed on the part of NASA is a far better explanation of what happened than any global conspiracy. Indeed, it seems to me that whenever someone like NASA wants to hide their own greed and other failings … we start to hear massive & very convenient (for NASA) conspiracy theories.

        • Let’s put it this way … how would NASA attack any politician who questioned whether NASA and for example the moon landings had any practical use?

          The simple answer is you try to portray them as a “moonlanding conspiracist”. You take their quite reasonable doubts about the usefulness of going to the moon (which was zero) and you then portray that as a crank disbelief about going to the moon.

          And as no politician can affor to be seen as a crank … you scare off any who dare to question the utility of wasting money on NASA.

          • RAH says:

            You and I are going to disagree on “the usefulness of going to the moon”. Without the knowledge gained and technology developed for the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs we would be well behind where we are now in our ability to operate in space.
            Plus much of the technology developed during those programs is in use in civilian industry today. And I’m not talking about Tang, and ink pens that write upside down. Tons of stuff used today was developed for and through the space program. Even to this day the “Space technology transfer to the civilian sector is quite active and important. Here is a partial list:
            https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2008/tech_benefits.html

            It is not complete by any means as I know from personal experience. For example HVOF (high Velocity Oxygen Flame) coatings and techniques specifically developed for coating the rocket engine jet nozzles are used all over the place in industry. I know this because I knew the guy that developed the technology and I used it in applications when I had my own business. Applications like coating impeller blades for gas turbine engines, coating pump impellers and housings and key fittings used in oil fracking, etc.

          • RAH says:

            Oh I forgot to mention CVD (Carbon Vapor Deposition) technology also developed from NASA and used heavily in industry today.

          • Gail Combs says:

            RAH,
            I agree with you there. There was a LOT of spin-off from the pure research for the moon landing.

            It is too bad we wasted $$$ on the Climate hobgoblin instead of continuing.

            Sure would be nice to steer a direct hitting large meteor from earth or to mine mineral rich asteroids.

          • RAH says:

            Some types of rare earth are now more precious than gold. People keep fighting over oil but the fact is that without certain specific kinds of dirt or minerals our technological world would come to a grinding halt.

          • Gail Combs says:

            ‘Low-hanging fruit of the solar system’: NASA asteroid missions may be worth trillions (VIDEO)

            … NASA is sending a satellite to the surface of a Massachusetts-sized asteroid that is completely made of metal. Scientists say that if its nickel-iron ore could be mined, it would be worth trillions.

            NASA has funded a mission, which will be led by a group of scientists from Arizona State University, to send a satellite to investigate the surface of the asteroid, Psyche. The mission, which is scheduled to launch in 2023, but will not reach the asteroid until 2030, will be the first craft to explore the metallic asteroid, an extremely rare object in the solar system….

        • Gail Combs says:

          Mike it has ALWAYS been about GREED at the very base. Greed for POWER and the money that goes with it. SEE: The neurochemistry of power has implications for political change

          For thousands of years kings ruled with absolute power and what ever religion was allowed backed him up. Then came the Enlightenment, the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Ever since then the ‘elite’ have been trying to get the peasants back under control.

          CAGW is just the latest attempt.

          Never forget the Bolshevik Revolution was produced by the same set of bankers that gave the USA the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 link and they have been whipping up wars ever since to drain man power and wealth from the US middle class.

          Why the Bolshevik Revolution? Because the Russians were setting up a government similar to that of the USA and that is the LAST thing the would be Globalist Totalitarians wanted. If you look at the Middle East BEFORE Hillary, Bush and Obummer, they were making great strides in becoming modern, free AND DISENGAGING from the world bankers so they got bombed back into the seven century. link and link

  3. OMG so many new things got to know through this article..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.