Trouble Deepens For Arctic Fraudsters

The usual batch of government and MSM crooks keep insisting that the Arctic is hot and melting.

It is all fake news. Greenland has gained a record amount of ice this winter.

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

Arctic sea ice in the Chukchi, Bering and East Siberian Seas is piling up, and the thickest in several years.

DMI Modelled ice thickness

Arctic sea ice extent is the same as 2006, 2015 and 2016. And it is increasing – past the average date for melt to begin. With cold air over the Bering Sea, extent is likely to keep increasing for the next week or two.

Charctic Interactive Sea Ice Graph | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis

The fraudsters will continue to lie as long as they are paid to, and think they can get away with it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

49 Responses to Trouble Deepens For Arctic Fraudsters

  1. Griff says:

    What about the ice cover in the Beaufort Sea?

    Canadian Ice service shows it thinner than last year… than any of the last 5 years.

    and in 2016 it melted out spectacularly even from a much thicker starting point.

    Also what about the sea ice volume? March PIOMAS figure shows a record low.

    I don’t see that extent being in contention for a place in bottom 3 lowest levels for the time of year as maximum approaches (may have been reached) is any cause for saying the ice is in good shape/not on a downward trend.

    • tonyheller says:

      The Beaufort Sea had thick ice in 2o12, but persistent springtime southerly winds blew it away from shore, leading to the “record” minimum. The winds this year are blowing out of the north.

      • Stewart Pid says:

        Tony – there are no winds in the Griff’s bizarro world and you must bow down and worship the satanic CO2 molecule which controls the destiny of all things and all beings ;-)

      • RAH says:

        Back to a spotless speckles solar disc.

        • Gail Combs says:

          It is going to be interesting to see what ENSO does. Maybe neutral?

          After occurrences of strong El Niño – 1997/98, 1982/83, 1972/73 – another El Niño did not appear again until three or four years later so a second El Niño right after last years would be rather unusual.
          Australian BOM has upgraded to an El Niño Watch which means a 50/50 chance.

          People need to remember an El Niño is actually an earth COOLING event so another El Niño may not mean what Warmists think it means.

          … El Niños were more common during the frigid Little Ice Age, a study has confirmed.

          These weather patterns are triggered by a warming in sea surface temperatures in the Pacific Ocean.

          The discovery could help scientists better predict El Niños and the impact they have across the world…

          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3345158/Is-El-Ni-o-linked-global-warming-Cooler-conditions-Little-Ice-Age-caused-increase-extreme-weather-says-study.html

          >>>>>>

          This is interesting Winter 2017 – Colder and Snowier

          We are living on a rapidly cooling planet, people are dying from the cold, yet there are politicians, governmental organizations and a host of people who have swallowed the global warming hysteria…

          Professor Valentina Zharkova at Northumbria University is just one example of a scientist being attacked by global warming proponents for publishing research suggesting there could be a 35-year period of low solar activity that could usher in an “ice age.” Zharkova and her team of researchers released a study on sunspot modeling, finding that solar activity could fall to levels not seen since the so-called “Little Ice Age” of the 1600s. She is just one of many scientists who have warned us but presidents and Popes have just chosen to ignore them.

          The warnings are coming in from all corners that climate change is real and is already hitting earth`s populations exceptionally hard. Many of today’s politicians face an intellectual massacre for instead of the record warming that NOAA has repeatedly been publishing we have extraordinary amounts of snow and cold…

          He then lists the record cold and record snows.

          This is a nutritional medicines type guy like The Health Ranger who you would think were progressives yet they both think global warming is a hoax and support trump.

          Maybe there is hope of others waking up to all the lies and deceit.

        • RAH says:

          Spotless and Speckles continues for the 9th.

    • Sunsettommy says:

      Still worried about the large ice pack,Griffygirl?

    • AndyG55 says:

      Still DENYING climate change from the first 3/4 of the Holocene, hey griff

      Still DENYING that the late 1970’s were years of extreme high sea ice, hey griff

      Still DENYING that we are still way above the pre-LIA norms, hey griff

      Still DENYING that a more open Arctic Sea for some part of the year would be highly BENEFICIAL for all people in the region, hey griff.

    • Latitude says:

      What about the ice cover in Jamaica?

      …oh the humanity

  2. Jim Hunt says:

    If only I weren’t out on the road heading towards the Met Office’s shiny new supercomputer I would be writing a similarly titled article as we speak! Sadly this will have to do for now:

    http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2017/03/facts-about-the-arctic-in-march-2017/

    • AndyG55 says:

      Nice plot of magma movement, Jimbo, you moronic yellow-back troll.

      Greenland total Ice mass

      Capeeeesh…

      Need I say more !!!!

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        Andy, there is an invisible but terror-inducing wiggle on the straight line and we’re all going to die.

        Jim Hunt should reproduce the graph on Met’s shiny new supercomputer to straighten you out.

      • Griff says:

        You could say where you got that unlabelled out of context and thus meaningless chart from.

        you could acknowledge that the surface mass balance only accounts for 2 thirds of Greenland ice mass change…

        • gator69 says:

          You could help stop genocide, but you hate poor brown people. Another 21,000 starved to death again today Ms Griff.

          Do you care? No.

          To Hell with them, you have an agenda.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Poor, pitiful, ignorant, griff…

          Sorry that you don’t have the brain capacity to work it out for yourself, little fool.

          Your ignorance is duly noted. !!

        • AndyG55 says:

          “you could acknowledge”.. that Arctic and Greenland regions are still WAY colder than during the first 3/4 or more of the current interglacial.

          Come on worm.. Acknowledge the FACTS..

          I DARE you !!!

          Or are you as COWARDLY is Jimbo the yellow-backed troll.

        • AndyG55 says:

          “that the surface mass balance only accounts for 2 thirds of Greenland ice mass change…”

          You are welcome to produce real data that show Greenland ice mass is declining…

          and no, not gravity based stuff that is most probably just picking up moving magma under the Greenland base… remember how accurate GRACE wasn’t over Antarctica. What a FARCE those gravity measurements were.

          Also, I recall GRACE found a whole mountain in Indonesia, that doesn’t exist… DOHHHH !!!

          GRACE measure gravity.. NOT sea ice mass.

        • pmc47025 says:

          Griff cannot comprehend the difference between 10^9 and 10^15. If they (Griffs?) are being paid to make alarmists look silly, they deserve a raise.

  3. TimiBoy says:

    As a very successful private Businessman, if I applied the same standards to decision making, historical understanding and forecasting that you Climate ‘Fraidy Cats do, I would have gone broke a long time ago. Correlation does not equal causation. But then there’s a reason you people aren’t private Business People…

    What do I deny?
    I deny that we are even close to having the technology to accurately model a system which is uncoupled, non linear, chaotic, and the size of a Planet.

    What do you deny?
    – That temperatures are not tracking predictions.
    – That CO2 sensitivity keeps getting revised downwards.
    – That the Antarctic is not behaving as modelled.
    – That the Arctic has been ice free before.
    – That the arctic was predicted to be ice free NOW.
    – That Global snow cover is increasing. (Was to be a thing of the past…)
    – That Polar Bears are doing quite well.
    – That Global Atmospheric Humidity is much higher than CAGW Theory requires. (No Hot Spot. You SAID there would be a Hot Spot.)
    – That Natural Variations are powerful drivers of Climate. Up until 2016 you said they weren’t and shrieked at any who disagreed with you. Now you say they are?
    – That Global Storm Energy is in a long decline.
    – That a Trillion dollars can be spent on research and not influence the minds of the researchers, while saying that a few million can and do on the other side.
    – That the rate of Sea Level rise is not increasing.
    – That Kilimanjaro’s ice cap is shrinking because of land use change.
    – That wind power is inefficient and environmentally destructive throughout it’s supply chain.
    – That large scale solar power is inefficient and environmentally destructive throughout it’s supply chain.
    – That increasing CO2 has many positive benefits.
    – That Science is not done by Consensus.
    – That Peer Review is extremely fallible.
    – That UHI is real and obvious.
    – That several iterations of data adjustment have always moved the past down, and the present up. every, single, time.

    Who are the Deniers?

    • Griff says:

      You are: as you are denying the accepted science. That’s the Oxford definition.

      Your long list is riddled with errors.

      I will just say: never mind the models, look at the actual observed temperatures and sea ice levels and changes in weather patterns. all show a warming trend, declining ice and changes in climate.

      • gator69 says:

        Ms Griff is a natural climate change denier, and hates poor brown people.

      • AndyG55 says:

        Poor little-brained griff..

        You are NEVER one to make comment on any sort of science.

        You have proven time and time again that even the most rudimentary science is WAYYYYYY beyond you.

        Warming trend out of the COLDEST period in the last 10,000 years.

        Thank Goodness !!!!!

        Remind us again griff.. nice grandma paid basement, with fossil fuel heating. Not living where it is COLD like in the LIA???

        Like it warm, don’t you, little girl !!!

        there is a word for that… HYPOCRISY .

        • Gail Combs says:

          Griffy’s Warming Trend

          200 year non-tree ring proxy world trend.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Griffy’s Warming Trend

          10,000 year trend – ice core

        • Gail Combs says:

          Griffy’s Warming Trend

          Five Million Year Trend

        • Gail Combs says:

          Griffy’s Warming Trend

          65 Million year Trend

        • Gail Combs says:

          GEE
          Sure looks like an overall COOLING TREND with warm-cold cycles superimposed.

          Those cycles have even been identified.
          Royal Meteorological Society
          Abrupt and sudden climatic transitions and fluctuations: a review: “…A number of persistent oscillations exist, particularly one about 1500 years, but their amplitudes vary considerably between time periods. The Holocene appears to be no more climatically benign than the similar period in the Eemian.”

          CLIMATE CYCLES:
          60 year PDO/AMO ocean cyclesThe Sixty-Year Climate Cycle “The cycle length is approximately 62 years, with maxima around 1879, 1942 and 2002, and minima around 1910 and 1972.”

          88 year cyclePersistence of the Gleissberg 88-year solar cycle over the last ∼12,000 years

          200 year cyclePaleoclimate forcing by the solar De Vries/Suess [200 year] cycle “As there is increasing interest in temperature rise rates, as opposed to present absolute temperatures, we have analyzed temperature differences over 100 years to shed light on climate dynamics of at least the last 2500 years. Fourier- and Wavelet transforms as well as nonlinear optimization to sine functions show the dominance of the ∼ 200 year cycle.”
          CONTINUED

        • Gail Combs says:

          500 year cycle500-year climate cycles stacking of recent centennial warming documented in an East Asian pollen record “a temperature proxy, revealed ~500-year quasi-periodic cold-warm fluctuations during the past 5350 years…. It was almost in phase with a ~500-year periodic change in solar activity and Greenland temperature change, suggesting that ~500-year small variations in solar output played a prominent role in the mid-late Holocene climate dynamics”

          1,000 year cycle High-resolution sea surface reconstructions off Cape Hatteras over the last 10 ka “Finally, wavelet transform analysis revealed a 1000-year period pacing the δ18O signal over the early Holocene. This 1000-year frequency band is significantly coherent with the 1000-year frequency band of Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) between 9.5 ka and 7 ka and both signals are in phase over the rest of the studied period.”

          1,400 – 1,500 year cycle “Dansgaard-Oeschger (D-O) events and Bond cycles are both abrupt climate change events that occured within the last glacial period. The existence of D-O events was first discovered in ice cores from Greenland by famous climatologists Willi Dansgaard and Hans Oeschger. D-O events follow a characteristic pattern of an abrupt warming followed first by a period of gradual cooling and then a more rapid cooling… it is unclear what causes the D-O events … Bond cycles occur over a longer scale than D-O events and are characterized by Heinrich events…” link

          41,000-year and 100,000-year Milankovitch cyclesA Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic D18O records
          Lisiecki & Raymo

          RESULTS
          Recent research has focused on MIS 11 as a possible analog for the present interglacial [e.g., Loutre and Berger, 2003; EPICA Community Members, 2004] because both occur during times of low eccentricity. The LR04 age model establishes that MIS 11 spans two precession cycles, with d18O values below 3.6% for 20 kyr, from 398 – 418 ka. In comparison, stages 9 and 5 remained below 3.6% for 13 and 12 kyr, respectively, and the Holocene interglacial has lasted 11 kyr so far. In the LR04 age model, the average LSR of 29 sites is the same from 398– 418 ka as from 250–650 ka; consequently, stage 11 is unlikely to be artificially stretched. However, the 21 June insolation minimum at 65°N during MIS 11 is only 489 W/m2, much less pronounced than the present minimum of 474 W/m2. In addition, current insolation values are not predicted to return to the high values of late MIS 11 for another 65 kyr. We propose that this effectively precludes a ‘‘double precession cycle’’ interglacial [e.g., Raymo, 1997] in the Holocene without human influence.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Griffy is a Climate Cycle Denier!

          Oh, and Griffy? Don’t think that high CO2 levels are going to save you from the next cool or glaciation.

          Every ice-age began when CO2 was at or near peak levels, in other words, high CO2 levels were not enough to prevent ice ages!

      • AndyG55 says:

        “Your long list is riddled with errors.”

        That is a LIE. !!

        You are DENYING science and FACTS yet again, griff

    • Gail Combs says:

      TimiBoy, WOW nice list.

      What is interesting is any intelligent unbiased person who actually LOOKS at the evidence turns into a skeptic and remains one. No skeptic has turned into a warmist.

      Note how Griffy turns it into ACCEPTED Science.

      ACCEPTED Science = Science by CONSENSUS and not science by the scientific method.

      ACCEPTED Science = STAGNATION with no advancement AT ALL. We would all be shivering in caves if humans ALWAYS followed ACCEPTED Science because everyone would reject fire and tools as not being the ACCEPTED Science of the day.

      • Robertv says:

        Plants, flowers and trees that started to bloom in the recent warmth could be damaged. Washington’s famed cherry blossom trees will have to wait a bit longer for peak bloom: Due to colder than average weather, peak bloom is now projected for March 19-22, the National Park Service said Wednesday.

        http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2017/03/08/winter-returning-to-eastern-us/98907958/

        “winter’s revenge”

        • Gail Combs says:

          Our cherry trees were blooming a week or two ago. This week it was down as cold as 22F and we get snow/ice pellets this weekend — YUCK

          The Effect of Frost on Fruit Tree Blossoms

          Critical Temperatures

          Early in development, when the buds are just turning green, the temperature must drop to 20 degrees Fahrenheit before even 10 percent of the buds are damaged on most fruit trees. However, to destroy 90 percent of these early buds, the temperature must drop to below 10 degrees Fahrenheit. Cherries are the exception and are heavily damaged at 25 degrees Fahrenheit in the early stages. After the blooms have opened, all fruit trees will lose 90 percent of their fruit if the temperature drops to 25 degrees Fahrenheit. Damage begins to occur to full blooms at 28 degrees Fahrenheit.

          This cold snap could have a major affect on tree fruit grown in the mid-Atlantic states.

          One of the things Griffy and Jimmy Boy completely ignore is the changes in weather patterns to the ‘loopy jets’ of a cooling planet are the real killers not the actual temperature.

        • RAH says:

          A warmer than usual February normally harkens a colder than normal March and that is exactly what the European and NCEP models are predicting, especially for the central and NE US. Lookout, all you folks from PA on to the NE because if the WEATHER models are correct the ski slopes, and about everywhere else are going get a big one again. And significant snow may also be coming for Kentucky also. Snow is supposed to come in three waves this month, one right after the other.

  4. RAH says:

    My Personal weather bugaboo was the wind yesterday afternoon. They changed my assignment and got me out of bed to take empty parts racks up to Battle Creek, MI. There the empty racks were unloaded and racks full of heater -A/C cores with fan units for some model of Honda automobile were loaded. On the way up I-69 it was a real bear in Indiana with winds running 40 mph and gusting quite a bit higher coming out of the west and hitting the rig directly in the side.

    Being light sucks in those situations. Had to slow to 45 mph along a 7 mile stretch of I-69 where there are no wind breaks and open fields for miles to the west. Saw one blow over on the south bound side. Poor driver would have seen the asphalt and dirt flying by his nose and cheek laying over on the window as he slid along. If I or any north bound truck had gone over it would have been on the passenger side.

    It is work driving in those conditions. Total concentration looking for the tells of high winds and reacting with the wheel to the gusts as you look in your driver side mirror and see you trailer leaning over 10 deg or a little more. It makes or a jerky drive. But Honda had to have the parts or an assembly line would shut down. Big bucks.

    • RAH says:

      Oh, the Honda plant I delivered to is in Greensburg, IN., exit 132 off I-74.

    • Gail Combs says:

      That is one reason I HATE Just-In-Time.

      The bean counters love it. The HAAAaaavard MBAs love it. The stockholders love it. And the rank and file who have to scramble to make it work absolutely HATE IT!

      I had to drive on slick icy roads covered with snow in a blizzard to get to work so I could test and approve loads headed up to the foundry in Chicago.

      Without those castings the foundry would be shut down. So the entire factory had to risk their lives to go in to work in some of the worse driving conditions I have ever seen. (We do not have plows or sanders) Then some poor sucker of a driver had to take those casting up north in the teeth of the blizzard.

      Thank goodness I had the brains to have bought chains for all four wheels of my pick-up and had loaded the bed so it was not light in the rear. I made that trip and several more at under 20 mph while working at that factory.

      Meanwhile the upper management stayed home because of the weather… GRRRRRRRrrrrr.

      • RAH says:

        Thankfully the wind had abated by the time I was headed south bound for the Honda plant and what wind there was didn’t bother me because the rig was 15,000 lbs heavier than it was going up. I was thankful for that because at night you can’t see the tells to anticipate the places where there are gust nearly so well.

        In conditions when winds are gusting at near 90 degrees to your direction of travel one of the real danger spots one needs to watch are passing under the overpasses. The air compresses and wind speeds up significantly along the embankments in places.

  5. THIS NEW HYDROELECTRIC SCIENTIFIC FORMULA (E>P+1at) IS THE NEAR FUTURE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY!

    (Ee>Ep+E1at) = (E>P+1at)

    THE HAPPY NEWS AND UNBELIEVABLE FOR SCIENTISTS OF ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE.”

    A new renewable energy discovery on global hydroelectric! For the production of electricity from water, We had methods of (Dams, lagoons power plant and water wave) before. Now we have a new renewable energy discovery on global hydroelectric! It can change the world and start a new industrial revolution in the world.
    The KURDESTAN ELECTRICITY is a new renewable energy on hydroelectric with its new formula (Ee>Ep+E1at) = (E>P+1at). Now this new formula added to all renewable energy of hydroelectric in the world.
    What is the most difficult scientific question of global hydroelectric that no one scientists could the answer to it?
    Now the hard global question!
    How can we produce clean energy in a best way by the potential of water Static head in dams & seas that this water pressure can push to the center of planet?
    Answer:
    This is by getting benefit of joint scientific formula (E>P+1at) with immersion turbines method inside the water of dams & seas (Immersion turbines of series and parallel in zero point of opposite forces).
    Ee= High pressure clean energy that is produced by the water power plants in the depth of water via released fixed potential energy of water natural pressure (More than ten meters of water) with new method (Immersion turbines of series and parallel in zero point of opposite forces).
    Ep= Released fixed potential energy of water natural pressure in water depth (More than ten meters of water).
    E1at= Amount of energy that is consumed at a small pump of one atmosphere power is the ability (In the same place of the water power plant in water depth).
    Many scientists believe that the discovery of the formula is unparalleled. Although many still in shock! How this formula has not be discovered by scientists in the world. Answer to a hard question that scientists are searching for hundreds of years and they can control of climate change and stop global warming soon.
    My new formula and new method can change the world and start a new industrial revolution soon. Note: This new solution and this new formula invention in Iraq and Turkey to formally accepted.
    This invention is patented in Department of Justice in Kurdistan of Iraq No. 952/6 on 12/6/2013.
    http://rudaw.net/NewsDetails.aspx?pageid=110844

  6. Jim Hunt says:

    I’m sure you’re all desperate to see the UKMO’s shiny new high performance computing complex?

    Your long wait is over! It was open to some very special guests today:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.