NASA Temperature Graphs Are Fake News

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

  • George Orwell  1984

In 1999, NASA showed the US cooling from 1930 to 1998.

https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_ha03200f.pdf

That didn’t suit their funding needs, so they changed the 1930-1998 cooling into warming.

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

The animation below shows how they tampered with the data.

NASA also doubled 1880-2000 warming by tampering wth the data.

2001 version    2017 version

It is time to get rid of NASA’s fake climate program, and restore the past.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to NASA Temperature Graphs Are Fake News

  1. Edmonton Al says:

    Tony….
    I hope that your evidence is presented to the committee that is investigating the NASA/NOAA data tampering.

  2. Analitik says:

    Do people think if HR 861 (US Bill to terminate the EPA by end of 2018) could be a good start?
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/861/text

    • Rud Istvan says:

      EPA needs fundamental reform. See newly introduced (today) HONEST 2017. Another example is the linear no threshhold nonsense. But there is still a legitimate role in clean air and water. Abolition is not the best solution.

      • Gene says:

        No, Rud, there is no legitimate role for the EPA in the future. The agency quickly became a role model for carbon-copy state agencies, and in Massachusetts (and I suspect other states), even cities and towns have created mini-EPAs to regulate, tax, and control their citizens. If the EPA disappeared tomorrow, states certainly have enough power and control to insure a continued supply of clean air and water.

  3. AZ1971 says:

    Continual “review and adjustment” of past data—and worse, current data—renders the entire temperature record unreliable. That climate scientists then use a made-up record as evidence for agreement on the debate of global warming is spurious and a lie.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Try continual ” “review and adjustment” of past data” in any government regulated industry and you will be looking out through bars.

  4. TA says:

    Tony’s charts are just devastating to the CAGW narrative. I made a copy.

  5. Andy DC says:

    I hope the irresponsible heads will roll at NOAA/NASA and that scientific integrity is restored!

  6. Mike Goldsby says:

    Does anyone know of a reliable source for world average temperature data (assuming such a concept as average world temperature is meaningful at all…)?

    • tonyheller says:

      The only reliable sources are satellites and balloons, but those only go back to 1979 and 1958 respectively. US temperatures are good back to 1895

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *