Climate Barbie Plays The Sex Card

Posted on February 5, 2018 by tonyheller

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to Climate Barbie Plays The Sex Card

  1. Stewart Pid says:
    February 5, 2018 at 4:10 am

    Go get her Tony!!

    Reply
  2. Cam says:
    February 5, 2018 at 4:25 am

    With the twelve step program the government has for screening tweets, you will have a while between replies. It takes a week or two to vet each one.

    Reply
  3. AndyG55 says:
    February 5, 2018 at 5:12 am

    Please Tony, use the words “GENDER Card”

    And someone using the name “climatebarbie” complains of sexism… SERIOUSLY !!

    Massive cognitive dissonance.

    Reply
    • arn says:
      February 5, 2018 at 12:40 pm

      Well-
      first we have to analyze wether Miss HighHoe and Barbie are even female or
      one of the other 50+ genders
      as i am pretty sure that the followers of climate islam are as much into genderism(which is scientifically utter nonsense)
      as they are into climate.
      As there can not be sexism or mysogenisn when it turns out that they are not even female and belong to the same gender as those who criticize them.

      But something deep inside me tells me that they’d instantly reduce all genders to male and female((as it is has always been in history of mankind and science))when they can play the victim
      just the same way as they (re-)define weather and climate as they need it when it suits their agenda and the same way they completely ignore their failed preditictions& cold anomalies while they exaggerate the warm ones and call them proove for the warmest whateever ever.

      Reply
  4. Brett_McS says:
    February 5, 2018 at 11:27 am

    “Climate dingbats”. That’s a keeper!

    Reply
  7. Rick says:
    February 5, 2018 at 3:26 pm

    As a Canadian, I must express my embarrassment that we present Climate Barbie and Prime Minister as our “leaders”.

    With respect to her desperate attempt to rely on sexism as the cause for “deniers” targeting her, I doubt she has had as rough a ride as Dr. Judith Curry, whose opinion I value and respect.

    Climate Barbie is a clueless ideologue parroting a defenseless rhetoric.

    Reply
  8. Mark Fife says:
    February 5, 2018 at 3:34 pm

    Completely off topic, but…….

    With regards to the FISA scandal, am I the only one who noticed the timing of events?

    June 2016: 1st FISA request failed – even though 99.97% of FISA request are approved.

    Sept 2016: Hillary Clinton collapses at 9/11 memorial on a mild day.

    Oct 2016: New FISA application submitted and approved using the dossier.

    It also appears Fusion GPS started leaking parts of the dossier to the media at about this time.

    As we now know, the dossier is pretty stupid crap. Yet, without it the couldn’t get a warrant approved from a court that appears to be a sure bet. And Hillary wasn’t looking so good. My theory is the dossier was supposed to be an October surprise leaked from unnamed sources and salacious enough to grab attention. But someone let panic get the best of them and then called someone else and said let her rip.

    Otherwise, why would anyone risk getting slapped with perjury charges or contempt of court for misleading and lying to a judge?

    You can forget what the democrats are saying. Their status as lying liar holes should be evident to everyone from last week’s wail of woe over how dangerous the Nunes memo was going to be and how it would expose all those hard working men and women to serious danger.

    Reply
    • Gator says:
      February 5, 2018 at 3:51 pm

      Judicial Watch originally filed a FOIA request in July 2016 — which the Justice Department did not comply with — seeking “all records of communications between any agent, employee, or representative” of the FBI for the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server use, and all records related to the June 27, 2016 meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton.

      Hmmm… June 27th… nothing to see here… move on…

      Reply
      • Mark Fife says:
        February 5, 2018 at 4:46 pm

        Nice. You know the added benefit of having an investigation open is being able to legally refuse FOIA requests and refuse to provide materials or answer questions to congressional committees or in hearings.

        Convenient thing that.

        I believe that is the rational behind the Mueller investigation and also why nothing has really happened with it. What is the man doing?

        Mueller?
        Mueller?

        Mueller?

        Reply
        • RAH says:
          February 6, 2018 at 7:13 am

          I don’t know why they don’t call Muller, Rosenstein, and McCabe before some committee to testify on why they allowed the Uranium One deal to go down.

          Reply
          • Mark Fife says:
            February 6, 2018 at 1:24 pm

            I don’t know why they don’t impanel a grand jury for uranium one and FISAGate. Bring your crap and be ready to sing.

            But they say it is national security. No freaking problem. Let’s empower a special prosecutor who ISN”T a swamp creature to go through it and decide.

  9. Gord says:
    February 6, 2018 at 4:48 am

    Has Barbie responded to the debate challenge?

    Reply
  10. gofer says:
    February 6, 2018 at 6:20 am

    McKenna attended the University of Toronto and studied French and International Relations. She then attended the London School of Economics where she studied International Relations, and a law degree from McGill University. She has no science training and probably no significant math training at all.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *