All others are banned.
The host tells me that I can “do better” than post factual information.
How long before I get banned for posting factual information?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Jeff L. on Skynet Becomes Self-Aware
- czechlist on Skynet Becomes Self-Aware
- conrad ziefle on Skynet Becomes Self-Aware
- Robert Austin on Red Hot Germany
- Disillusioned on The Worst Crisis Ever
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
What a funny thing? All of the banned links are to people who insist on providing verifiable scientific facts!
We can’t have these; someone might be offended – and nasty facts are not politically correct, don’t you know?
Hilarious!!
I give you less than 3 days..
They are such idiots, probably don’t even know who you are, but when they do..
* Blip * Gone !!
This strategy goes hand in hand with facebook and twitter deleeting comments right now from people proving that Baltimore is a ratinfested shithole.
(but i guess feces,rats and return of medieval diseases isn’t as dangerous as AGW- i mean:”What is reality compared to some BS you are forced to believe as they have been delivered by unproductive masterracish people with degree”
Not a very “Open” open discussion is it?
They have been surreptitiously siphoning water from the Totos’ water bowls too. During summer heat. Nothing is beneath them.
“Climate Change – An Open Discussion”!!!
Well, not quite that open!
Paul Are you serious?
Don’t you see the sarcasm?
Whatever they say and claim
(islam-religion of peace
diversity is strength)
the opposite is the real thing.
When they claim they are tolerant
you can be sure they are the most intolerant.
When they claim BLM- you can be sure that they don’t give a crap 99.9% of all the time and only white till a life gets ended by the “right” person to exploit it massivly.
open discussion = you can be sure it is hermetically closed.
There is no dialogue in AGW and it was created that way from the very beginning on purpose.
That”s why they used shaming tactics,charackter assassinations and name calling from the very beginning.
Everything was designed from the go to that there is absolutely no accepptable alternative to AGW.
True Ostrich mentality,”if I bury my head in the sand, it will all go away”
It reveals just how much ground these sites are gaining when the believer sites shutdown discussion and debate.
It’s uncanny the similarities between Climate sciences’ belief in man as the cause of recent warming, and the Medical professions’ ardent belief that miasma (foul air) was the cause of disease.
Carbon tax = Blood letting
CO2 = Foul air
It’s not science, it’s quackery.
We are rapidly approaching Peak Jackassery.
But like a stock market peak during a bubble, the foolishness can go on for far longer than anyone might have anticipated from a careful review of the facts.
When a transexual woman can legally force minority women to Brazil wax “her” scrotum, something is literally and terribly out of whack.
can always count on Shearer for the double entendres
BTW…always good to have another list of sources of reliable info.
I’ze gwine to go thank them for it!
Yeah so true, I forgot about The GWPF, I went for a look see and had a laugh.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=golAjKMDuVk
Poor muppets were obviously getting pulverised in every scientific argument.
So SAD.
So PATHETIC !
So HILARIOUS. :-)
Climate change: An open and shut case -clamlike. Keep quiet and send more money.
Oh look, the Nazi book club! Grab some marshmallows!
We refuse to debate deniers.
We won the argument.
The debate is over.
That sums up the climate movement’s attitude changes over the years.
At least we can thank him for putting together a great list of factual climate sites as opposed to those operating on blind faith and politics and deliberate dishonesty!
But The Grauniad opinion page is fine. No issues with facts there.
Well, there it is. These people have gone full Goebbels. Nothing but state-approved propaganda will be allowed. This is a very scary time to be alive, and, despite dishonest leftist blathering, it has nothing to do with President Trump. Democrats are warlike rabid animals who are totally out of control. Eight years of Obama followed by Trump’s election made them all collectively psychotic, and now they’re actually trying to destroy human civilization.
First Rule of the IPCC
“Any reality or science that does not fit with the official truth is a conspiracy”
Yeah, either that, or you’re a Russian bot.
Tony
This sounds more like Nazi Germany or the USSR by the day.
Don’t these guys realise that in TRUE science you don’t get to pick the facts, they just are. But their science is more akin to witchcraft and voodoo than anything else.
These clowns want to sit in some safe echo chamber, listening to each other and nodding furiously. All very nice, without having to actually consider the facts.
I was informed today that temperatures will increase by at least three degrees by 2040, and sea levels will keep rising. This science is indisputable!! Anyone who disagrees is a f#*+ING moron.
Jah Herr Oberfuhrer.
Sea level has risen by about 400 ft in the last ~12,000 years. It’s not likely to see anytime soon, but if it does, it’s probably not a good thing.
Yes, and it’s been higher in the past. Sea level seems to go up and down, like temperature.
Just be glad you live in a democracy where laws protect independent thought. Instead of being censored, you could be stoned to death if you lived in a theocracy or end up in Siberia or some other horrible location if you lived in a dictatorship.
Technically, it is a constitutional republic. A democracy is tyranny by majority.
Thank you for that!
It infuriates me when people refer to America’s form of government as a “Democracy” .. we are not a “Democracy” !!!
Democracies breed tyrants. Democracies are ruled by the mob. Democracies enslave the minority. In a Democracy, the majority extinguishes the rights of the minority.
We have thousands of years of historical example of what happens in a “Democracy” .. while the left would love to turn us into a Democracy, few things could be more dangerous.
The United States of America was designed as a Constitutional Representative Republic .. far far away from a “Democracy”.
Daniel Swahn Lindberg: Another “weather has always changed” type of argument. There, fixed it for you.
Proof there is an alternate reality.
I regularly read and have bookmarked nearly all the “banned sources” on the list. I must really be a bad, misinformed man. As a supporter of the current US president, and an old white guy, I’ve been called all the politically bad names in the book. If you add that I don’t like soccer or political correctness, and I believe there are two sexes, and I support really free speech — especially on college ‘campi,’ I must be a terrible, terrible person. Funny, I used to have a pretty good reputation.
One would think I should belong to some victim group, with all the privileges thereof.
That list of banned sites is a pretty good club to be in. I have found each of them to provide factual information blocked or denigrated at sites belonging to or managed by “the Team”. I wonder why.
Congratulations Tony, for making it into the biggest league – sources of fact and the occasional flipped bird bringing history to light.
Holding an open discussion is a really good idea. Keep it up here and more will join in the consultation. Weather is complicated, highly variable and endlessly interesting. I have loved my study of it since I was a child.
Tony, there was a heat wave in France in 1961. Was that something unusual or was it fairly common (1 year out of 10?). Why does a heat wave in a Mediterranean country surprise anyone who lives there?
Thanks
This is really entertaining! RCS as a source is banned, so TH posts in person. Good to start the day off with a laugh. It will be interesting to see how this goes. Thanks Tony!
Here’s one they missed:
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=0&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=6
Fakebook; verifying the popular nickname every hour of every day.
They also missed these “perpetually produced misconceptions, misrepresentations, errors and falsehoods about climate science”:
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=nhland&ui_season=4
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=nhland&ui_season=1
How long before you get banned for posting factual information, you ask?
3 … 2 … 1 …
You know CAGW theory predicts more snow….
(or less snow,or the end of snow.)
Yeah, my head is spinning from their never-ending, disingenuous spin. Hard to keep up with them. The moving goal posts for the climate changes is akin to acceptable and unacceptable terms of ‘political correctness’ – they change it up all the time (to maintain control). What is mind boggling is that their idiot followers never catch on.
I did.
Disillusionment: https://youtu.be/0UqQYnbbkQ4?t=22
That list of banned sites seems like it may be useful. I only knew of a few of them.
It’s funny that those who don’t disregard data are the ones called deniers and those who do find reasons to disregard every measurement that disagrees with them are practicing good science.
Climate “scientists” use starting points rather selectively coming up with a reason to disregard the previous. But there are also examples when government experts did the opposite. For instance, in 1974 when Nixon imposed the 55mph NMSL the government also dramatically changed what counted as fatality in automobile crashes. Basically 1973 and prior data cannot be compared to 1974 and later. It is two very different systems that are not compatible. What did they do? Showed how much fatalities dropped from ’73 to ’74 and we were stuck with the 55mph NMSL for the next 20 years. In every field of government funded science they will only use a measurement or policy change to disregard previous data when it suits them. It does not matter how small or how minor. If it suits them to compare as if it never happened, regardless of how severe of change they will.
I see people that criticized the rule changes got booted from the group. Seems like Daniel Swahn Lindberg wants an echo chamber not an open discussion.
“Another climate has always changed type of argument”
Is he intimating that climate hasn’t always changed? Who’s the climate change denier?
Color me no longer a skeptic. That site makes it adamantly clear that the whole movement is a scam and I am 100% sure the alarmism is all BS. Wow! Anyone with a fact is hence forth banned. It is a cult.
“Do not answer a fool according to his folly, Or you will also be like him” Proverbs 26:4
“Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.” –Mark Twain
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” –George Carlin
Wisdom that has withstood the tests of time and experience.
Tony, your time and efforts are BEST spent informing the inquisitive and prodding the open minded to THINK!!! You can win them over with “one brain lobe tied behind your back” in debates vs M. Mann (truly a source of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change) and his fellow travelers.
Keep up the GOOD FIGHT!!!
Yet again we see the left in action.
Their standard MO is to simply ban anyone and everything they dislike, disagree with or cannot beat in open debate with actual evidence.
Belief trumps evidence every time. They do it ALL the time. Not worth p*ssing on if they were on fire.
What they are actually saying is ” These sources are having too much influence on our followers.”
“They are banned because they show us up for the very reasons we falsely attribute to them. We can’t beat them and their truth, so we must ban them!”
It’s a modern version of the Nazi book burnings.
I am reminded of Messier’s List.
For you non-astronomers, Messier was a comet hunter in the late 1700s. He got tired of getting excited about anomalies he saw in space that weren’t comets. So he made a list of the junk, so he could check when he saw them again.
Fast forward. His list is the gold standard of interesting objects in space to see. His junk is our gold.
And the above list of websites looks like Messier’s List of great science websites to see! Good job, Lindberg!
Propagating such a great list of valuable sources of information so that people can educate themselves and get out of the CAGW church !??
Doesn’t that deserve banning ?
Daniel Swahn Lindberg !
You should ban yourself !
PS : do not forget to ban some other nasty sites that dare to bring unbearable factual information such as :
– http://ocean.dmi.dk
– http://globalcryospherewatch.org/state_of_cryo/snow/
– http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/
– http://www.summitcamp.org/status/webcam/
– http://www.climate4you.com
– https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/ocean/
– https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/
– https://climatereanalyzer.org/wx/DailySummary/#t2anom
– http://www.woodfortrees.org
– http://www.pensee-unique.fr/
– …
I just read a few pages of the arrogant and deeply ignorant posts on that “Open” Fakebook discussion bored, and …
…and I came across this gem from Joe Romm: We don’t have 12 years to save the climate. We have 14 months.
The deadline for protecting our children from a ruined climate is close at hand.
Joe Romm
Jul 26, 2019, 8:00 am
https://thinkprogress.org/we-dont-have-12-years-to-save-the-climate-we-have-14-months-71401316dbc4/
Deadline: POTUS election 2020
Tony
Thanks for posting that, there are some sites in it I wasn’t aware of, but will visit in the next few days.
Love is hate, war is peace and now it seems that open is closed.
I doubt they actually read any Orwell, it probably comes naturally to them.
Yes! New York, a great place to be. I’m parked along the curb of 56 Rd looking at the intersection with 49th St. in Maspeth, NY waiting to deliver Nestle’s product to a place called Big Geyser. What a hole!
Tony, why are you even bothering with a climate alarmist Facebook group? You’re tilting at windmills. The one you reference has only 5,000 members. Here’s an actual Climate Change Discussion group with over 22,300 members that welcomes all opinions and sites, including yours.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/241426845941348/
Here’s another discussion group with over 16,500 members:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/airclimateenergy/
Why waste your energy and time on people with hands over their eyes and ears and who truly hate your guts?
Although not a Mormon, I come from an LDS culture. If a member of the church persists in criticizing the religion, they are excommunicated. The sites listed here have effectively been excommunicated from Daniel S. Lindberg sect of the CAGW religion.
How the righteous moan when the tables are turned:
“The White House Blocked My Report on Climate Change and National Security”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/30/opinion/trump-climate-change.html
The comments are priceless!
How very Orwellian Newspeak of the owner of “Climate Change – An Open Discussion”. It means anything but. This is just another modern Nazi and Statsi/KGB equivalent of book burning.
I’ve been accused of posting false information on climate as well. What gives THEM the RIGHT to say someone’s information is wrong? Yes, climate has changed before – and faster than it’s changing now. Nobody is looking at what caused those woolly mammoths to freeze solid with flowers in their stomachs. Talk about climate change. What happened?
If “heatwaves have happened before” is your finest argument against AGW then I really wonder what the oil shills are paying you for.
This is the sort of mindless rhetoric I have come to expect from climate alarmists. Not a shred of reality in anything Jeff Jefferson says.
You’re really getting under their skin. So much so that they are now denying the very definition(s) of climate!
Jeffrey, if you believe it is wrong for someone to be making money based upon their views on climate change, then you must really be upset over the trillions spent on alarmists. And if money is corrupting science (and it is), then why are you not attacking those who are making millions off of climate change? Why are you here, where nobody gets paid for their work, where we give honest unsolicited opinions and facts?
Something tells me this is the “finest argument” that you have against our skepticism, and that you therefore have no argument whatsoever.
Buh-bye.