It Is A Nice Idea, But ….

Banning geoengineering over Florida makes an important political point, but it doesn’t actual protect anyone.  The atmosphere is constantly moving, and geoengineering anywhere affects the whole planet.

“Florida is not a testing ground for geoengineering. We already do not permit this type of activity, but we are going the next step to ensure it does not happen in this state.”

(1) Ron DeSantis on X: “Florida is not a testing ground for geoengineering. We already do not permit this type of activity, but we are going the next step to ensure it does not happen in this state. As soon as it reaches my desk, I will be signing the recently passed Senate Bill 56 to prohibit the https://t.co/x67fOPIEiF” / X

The 1600 eruption of Mt. Huaynaputina in Peru caused a famine in Russia which killed one third of the Russian population.

nhemtemp_data-noaa.txt

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to It Is A Nice Idea, But ….

  1. conrad ziefle says:

    It’s got to start somewhere with someone passing a law against it. Frankly, I would have made it a capital crime and then state that since the atmosphere is common to all of us, anyone doing geo-engineering anywhere on the global is subject to our state law. Maybe put a bounty out for anyone identified as doing it.

  2. arn says:

    It depends on the quantity(and altitude).

    One needs an impressive number of flights to match the mass of a top category volcano eruption.

    The USA has been massivly spraying highly toxic lead iodid and other stuff for more than 5 years over Laos,Cambodia and Vietnam alongside the bombing(and drug smuggling) to manipulate the weather(CiA ‘s Evergreen International Airlines used to call this service Geomodification on their website)
    and even without the knowledge of the secretary of defense.
    (Kissinger simply bypassed him,as he was way higher up in the real hierarchy than Laird.)

    The effects for the rest of the world were not relevant(but maybe they were ,as the ice age scare started during that timeframe 🙂

    But nice to see that De Santis joined us crazy people.

    • Hopefully, with the quantities of muck concerned, any effects will be localized. It does not inspire confidence if the predicted effects are reliant on current climate models.

  3. Ivan G Wainwright says:

    Interesting to note that the 1600 eruption coincided with a solar minimum. See Zharkova’s presentation available as a Tom Nelson podcast. We can expect the same in the current grand solar minimum between now and 2053. As Zharkova says, for the next thirty years, global warming will be the last thing on your mind.

    • Mike Peinsipp says:

      True and call it EDDY. It is the Eddy Minimum.

    • conrad ziefle says:

      The hottest recent year that I remember experiencing, was in the late 1980’s. My only measure is in days which reached 100f. I know this only because I was monitoring the temp as part of a utility load management program. In that year, we reached 100f in May and our last day to reach 100f was in October. That has happened since.

  4. Independent says:

    No, it doesn’t take away the risk of someone doing it elsewhere (the U.K.?), but it’s a step in the right direction from the best governor in America.

  5. D. Boss says:

    I abhor idiots who subscribe to the “chemtrail” nonsense. However this legislation is severely short sighted and frankly stupid. It has massive unforeseen consequences too.

    Under these broad terms, you could be charged criminally for spraying an air freshner, or for a farmer crop dusting with planes or helicopters as two examples.

    But the real danger is putting poorly thought out laws on the books like this, means libtards can then use them to shut down anything they want once they get the levers of power in their hands! Example all combustion is imperfect and some particulates are part of the exhaust of any IC engine – so this law can be misused to shut down society faster than the CO2 hoax.

    It’s a dumb assed move in my view.

    • arn says:

      If the wording of the law is accurate and differs precisely between exhaust and additional atmospheric enrichment there should be no backdoors/loopholes to exploit it.

      Not that any law will prevent them from doing it or that anyone will be actually held accountable,just as it happened with MK Ultra and the deliberate destruction of 99% of all evidence by the CiA Boss ,
      the spraying of San Francisco for a whole week with a bioweapon as happened in the 50ies and later Georgia even in Europe(but not in Georgia).

      And if you are worried about that kind of laws you are actually 50 years late.
      As they already exist on an international level – ENMOD.
      (but I’m pretty sure they did this just for entertainment)

    • Denis Rushworth says:

      Agree it is not a good law. I also expect the State authorities will get lots of calls from the ill informed each time they see an aircraft flying far overhead leaving a contrail as it must by the physics of the aircraft and the air in which it is flying.

      • The chemtrail grifters have used pictures of fuel dumps, water bombers, water methanol injection and the occasional regions of dry air which renders the trailing vortices invisible temporarily. Their folklore consists of the belief that contrails are engine efflux (which is actually seldom visible) and short lived, while trailing vortices are extremely persistent and last for several kilometres. Their ignorance of aerodynamics is comparable to that of the average climate alarmist.

    • conrad ziefle says:

      Yeah, just driving a car or maybe even breathing could be considered as contributing to the alteration of the planet. Isn’t that what the climate freaks have been saying all along? I have to assume that the people who put together this bill have defined geo-engineering within fairly strict limits saying such things as: purposeful, release of substances for the singular purpose of altering the environment, does not include byproducts of processes from modern human activities. I agree that it would be difficult to tailor the bill such that it catches only dispersion of extraneous substances in the atmosphere for the sole purpose of altering the environment, but if they had been careful, they might have done it.

  6. mwhite says:

    They may have banned it over Florida, but the tax payer is funding it over the UK

    https://dailysceptic.org/2025/05/08/sun-dimming-quango-has-800-million-of-taxpayer-money-to-blow-and-a-ceo-on-450k/

  7. Mac says:

    I think how it works is that it sets up the ability to sue another state — such as climate cultist California — if they release anything into the atmosphere and it drifts over Florida.

    It would be great, because California should be sued just for being California.

    • arn says:

      It works at the very base.

      It is better to have a law against it than not to have
      as then spraying is not illegal and it may take years to illegalize it – and only with tons of loopholes
      And the perception is on a whole different level.
      Doing something illegal will trigger the majority of people instantly.
      As long as it’s not illegal 95% will ignore it.

    • conrad ziefle says:

      Well I live in California, and it would be great to see my tax money spent on something other than collectivist religious ideas. 9.5% state income taxes this year, and all that I have to show for it is DEI, increased and more aggressive homeless, less educated kids on the streets doing stupid, and a rapid rail that exists on paper only.

  8. arn says:

    And spam of the day.

    The USA may not get Greenland or Canada ,
    but the Vatican is now the 51st state.

    Let’s hope his election was not a political one with globalist intentions to counter someone unwanted.

    • dearieme says:

      Of course it was anti-Trump. Trump should perhaps reflect on the years of the Avignon Popes and declare that there’s going to be a Mar-a-Lago Pope.

      • arn says:

        Righty right.
        He,after months of absence, already criticized JD Vance and Trump in the past weeks in his tweets – and I bet it was more than just election PR .

        And uberdumb propaganda channel called him a ” genuis choice”.

        Seems like he is to Bergoglio what Starmer is to Sunak/Johnson.
        Different face same game ignoring the original Agenda and his base in favor of climate etc.

    • conrad ziefle says:

      I’m sure he is another globalist communist and they chose him in hopes of swaying the US away from natioinalism.

  9. Jehzsa says:

    Another wonderful idea from the Holy-Hand-Grenade-Of-Antioch Grift.

    Just leave it in the hands of the folks who can’t predict the weather from one day to the next.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    Here’s another bright idea. Install barriers to block the jet streams in the upper levels of the atmosphere. While at it, block also the lower levels… just in case.

  10. Ulric Lyons says:

    There were very severe winters 1600-1603, which were discretely solar driven. Volcanic eruptions can cool boreal summers but not the winters. Winters 1600-01 and 1602-03 were the same type as in 1422, 1784, and 1963, and an earlier series included 830 and 1010 when the River Nile froze.

    pages 424-426
    http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/Weather.pdf

    https://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar

  11. Ulric Lyons says:

    In 2008 I found that large volcanic eruptions typically occur following an extreme cold boreal winter period, on a warm burst.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *