Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on UK Net Zero
- czechlist on UK Net Zero
- Francis Barnett on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Francis Barnett on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- arn on UK Net Zero
- Steven Fraser on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on UK Net Zero
- arn on UK Net Zero
- Robertvd on UK Net Zero
- arn on UK Net Zero
It’s a start. When Gore and his minions are serving 500 years we will have arrived.
Our AGW friends still think they have a chance in the court system – they should be thrilled about today’s major news item: “Supreme Court to Hear Global Warming Case Against Power Companies”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/06/supreme-court-hear-global-warming-case-power-companies/
However, combine this Supreme Court news with my Breitbart article from 11/27, and the fundamental fault within this Connecticut case and the two other global warming nuisance lawsuits could become a HUGE story in itself……………….
“Global Warming Nuisance Lawsuits Are Based on a Fatal Flaw” http://biggovernment.com/rcook/2010/11/27/global-warming-nuisance-lawsuits-are-based-on-a-fatal-flaw/
Excerpt: With many red flags, most notably an accusation relying on a memo not seen in full context even in lawsuits having the potential to reshape multibillion-dollar industries, a simple question must be asked: If no parallel is established between skeptic scientists and highly questionable tobacco industry maneuvers, do the Comer and Kivalina lawsuits unravel because they depend so heavily on the “reposition” phrase, and does the Connecticut case also crumble with other arguments about human-caused global warming, if the skeptic scientists’ criticisms of IPCC assessments are not corrupted?
The Union of Concerned Scientists , which is a political activist group, is worried about politics ignoring science when that is what they have been doing. ROFLMAO!!
Ted Turner is an Idiot
Obama made a big mistake pushing Health Care over Climate.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-05/obama-made-big-mistake-on-climate-bill-turner-says-update1-.html
Where is the firing squad.
I would guess with him being ” Mr Jane Fonda” he has the qualifications to make those claims. Being married to Hanoi Jane he should know that a bad climate bill to fight an imaginary problem was more important than a bad health care bill that was designed to waste tax payer money!
“and that’s causing scientists to worry that Republicans will use their new positions for
political grandstandingscientific advancement at the expense ofscientific advancementpolitical grandstanding.”There. It was garbled in translation from Cancuni and now says what it meant to say.
Not found in the same environment I think politicized science. makes this failure.
The AGW party is over!
“Turn out the lights, this party’s over…..”
Did you see Dandy Don died?
Yes, I heard the bad news about Dandy Don. But I wasn’t thinking about him when I did my post. Just a coincidence.