Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
It’s ‘the hottest year on record’, as long as you don’t take its temperature
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


Quoted in the UK!!!!
Of course you base your arguments on scientific practices rather than the clamors of the Chicken Little Brigade!
Maybe I should add that you tend to show the absurdity of the clamoring!
lmao “expert” fire.
You didn’t even manage to graph the records on the same baseline.
It’s ‘the hottest year on record’, as long as you don’t take its temperature
Nice.
US blogs Real Science and Watts Up With That
Very nice! This is very cool. To be mentioned next to WattUpWithThat—-congratulations!
his (i.e., James Hansen) state-sponsored temperature record is still the one cited by politicians and the media to support their belief that this is the “hottest year in history”.
i.e., political propaganda temperature record
They will probably say this is the hottest December on record. Hot, cold or in-between, every month is the hottest on record!
giss and hadcrut are not real empirical evidence.
that was my second tipoff following climate gate. i had been under the impression AGW hypothesis was supported by actual measurements, until i saw how scant data was tortured into a completely virtual product of their algorithms.
when asked on tv why they corrected the wrong way for UHI, the guy kinda turned white and said, “oh i’m a not scientist. i’m just a programmer.”
It’s the same kind of evidence that convicted Captain Dreyfus, or at least it verges on that.
Come to think of it, there was also a consensus in that case, at least in France. (At one time there were only about two dozen Dreyfusards in the entire country.)