Consensus Of Seventy-Five

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Consensus Of Seventy-Five

  1. Mike Davis says:

    I have read about this gem before and it brings a smile to my face every time. There are some who do not take kindly to being shown the extent of the consensus.

  2. peterhodges says:

    there’s lies. there’s damn lies. then there’s statistics.

  3. Dave N says:

    Someone remind these fools that the “consensus” used to be that the Sun revolved around the Earth, and remind them of what Einstein said about it taking only one experiment to prove a million others wrong. Now *he* was worth listening to.

  4. Baa Humbug says:

    2500 alarmed scientists standing on the wall.
    If one alarmed scientist……..
    …………….
    75 alarmed scientists standing on the wall.

  5. Erik says:

    ..but but everyone in cancun agreed – “A significant result” Bwahahaha….

    BAFFINBOY from the commend string:

    “What percentage of these nations agreed that AGW represented a clear and present danger that must be addressed on an urgent basis? Was it 1%? No. Was it 5%? No. Was it 20%? No. Was it 50%? No. Was it 70%? No. Was it 95%? No. Was it 100%. Yes!!!! A significant result. No “massaging” of figures required.”

  6. Ian says:

    “There are two kinds of statistics, the kind you look up and the kind you make up.”
    – Rex Stout

  7. Andy Weiss says:

    Figures don’t lie, but liars can figure!

  8. suyts says:

    You know………., advertising this stuff takes away much fun when you spring it on a warmista. Sigh, but I guess its good that they know sooner or later.

  9. Paul H says:

    I always have to laugh when they bring out the number of “scientists” who contributed to the IPCC reports.

    A multinational company called Evolve were trying to develop a windfarm up our way last year ( we saw them off fortunately). They openly bragged that 7 of their employees were among the IPCC contributors. I am quite sure they did not allow any commercial allegiances to affect their contributions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *