Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
“Should the press start investigating to discover the truth, or promote bad science?”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


IDK, it is much fun to make MSM look ridiculous while exposing flaws in the warmistas logic. If the press actually started doing its job, then we’d have to find something else they refuse to investigate.
The press should do what the press does best; promote bad science.
Maybe the mainstream media is still united on a ‘conspiracy’ to report nothing but items supporting AGW, but this unity is becoming more fragile each day. Everyone knows how fickle the media is, and how they are ultimately driven to out-scoop each others for ratings gains. If they smell blood in the water about this entire so-called crisis being in imminent collapse, they will turn on each other and the AGW promoters in a heartbeat, no doubt with yells of being hoodwinked or assuming other news outlets had initially checked the voracity of the science everyone else relies on. It could get spectacularly ugly.
They could start by blaming each other for never checking the voracity of the accusation against skeptic scientists going back to 1996: “How an Enviro-Advocacy Group Propped Up Global Warming in the MSM” http://bigjournalism.com/rcook/2010/11/02/how-an-enviro-advocacy-group-propped-up-global-warming-in-the-msm-a-nov-2-election-connection/
Is it corruption, stupidity or insanity? Probably a healthy dose of all three.
The answer is: Climate Change Seminars
The press has been systematically brainwashed by climate seminars organized by the UN and the World Meteorological Organization, Met Office and even big Press Agencies like Reuters.
http://notrickszone.com/2010/12/30/international-conference-communicating-disaster-spreading-climate-propaganda/
Also read the comments for further links
We have to stop thinking this is not a conspiracy.
It is a conspiracy and all involved have been bribed and brainwashed.
It’s a quasi-religious system of belief. Conspiracies are more clandestine.