In 1903, scientists observed that glaciers were receding all over the world, and recognized that it was due to cosmic climatic changes.
Now scientists simply lie, make up utterly nonsensical fake data, and parrot brainless theories.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Gordon Vigurs on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Jack the Insider on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Bruce of Newcastle on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Bob G on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Gamecock on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- arn on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- oeman50 on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- D. Boss on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- arn on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
Real science requires getting off your duff and looking at things… Playing around with computer models is much for fun… I mean you can control the outcome and stuff.
GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
Station Data: Harare (Kutsa (17.9 S,31.1 E)
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=156677750000&dt=1&ds=14
Maybe GISS forgot to update this station.
Maybe GISS forgot to update this station.
Don’t worry, they’ll get around to it.
And they don’t like it when people have contrarian ideas. You must conform…….
Clive Best has a really good summary of the “dust-ice-albedo” theory for ice age modulation – and therefore for global temperature control. It is not an idea that the establishment likes to talk about too much, but it is logical and likely….
http://clivebest.com/blog/?p=7024
.
ral, you’re right that it’s not an idea that we like, but we do talk about it, and we talk about it a lot more than Clive Best. Here is where we begin our discussions:
http://darksnow.org/
We?
Me and everyone else who is interested in the Dark Snow project, Doug.
From the darksnow.org link, a Martin Sharp…Could that be the source of ‘We-ness’?
https://uofa.ualberta.ca/earth-atmospheric-sciences/people/person/msharp
Because we both have the same given name? Is it really so foreign to you to think that I might just find the subject interesting? Aren’t you genuinely interested in climate science? The greenhouse effect? Anthropogenic global warming? If you’re not actually interested in these subjects, what are you doing?
I was a denier before you were born.
Mart is not interested in climate science, The greenhouse effect, Anthropogenic global warming
He calls it reall peer-reviewed papers SPAM. He is only interested in PROPAGANDA like that found in SkS.
Gail, your posts are silly.
Everything has its price.
Martin hum guess you be the clod from climate deniers blog do believe I called you SS cook O:-)
Hi lorne. I don’t smoke the weed. My body’s a temple.
That’s good the rectal gases would light your head on fire (head up ass and all)
Don’t quit your day gig, lorne.
I get gas out of the ground you spout shit out of your mouth 😉
The basic principles of science are as sacred to real scientists as Catholicism is to the Pope.
But we almost all failed to seriously consider the warning in George Orwell’s two books
1. “Animal Farm” on the rise of Comminism before WWII, and
2. “Nineteen Eighty-Four” on the rise of a new form of Communism based on
Falsehoods disguised as unanimous, consensus scientific conclusions.
On pages 153-154 of his 1994 autobiography, “Home Is Where The Wind Blows”, Sir Fred Hoyle explains the rise of unanimous, consensus science immediately after WWII:
Fred Hoyle and everyone he knew in the field of astronomy and astrophysics agreed that the interior of the Sun was:
1. Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945, but
2. Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946
and the change in opinions was unanimous, with no discussion or debate.
Most real scientists could not believe our government capable of purposefully deceiving the public after WWII, until Climategate emails finally forced us to consider that fact in 2009.
The future seems bleak today, but I am absolutely certain that ancient scriptures will be confirmed:“Truth is victorious, never untruth.”
“Falsehoods disguised as unanimous, consensus scientific conclusions.”
If your argument is that the consensus is always wrong, it’s a pretty silly argument.