Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Climate Correlation
- arn on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- arn on “most secure in American history”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- conrad ziefle on “most secure in American history”
- oeman50 on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- dm on “most secure in American history”
- Dave Burton on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- Tel on “most secure in American history”
Left-Wing Press Getting Increasingly Desperate
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
a better observation of the climate…
Do all of these guys just work with GISS
Sure, but can the guy accurately predict next week’s weather? Didn’t think so.
http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
“Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive”
You can know with absolute certainty that when the LA Times plays the “evangelical Christian” card it’s for purely political reasons.
Why do I smell a rat in how this LA Times article was written?
He remembers thinking it ridiculous when a noted climatologist told Congress in 1988 that he was all but certain that the climate was changing.
He means this 1988 guy?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhTxM2ith5k
Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. He believes marriage is between a man and a woman. He backs a strong military. He almost always votes Republican and admires Ronald Reagan.
You’re right, they are desperate.
Horribly desperate. Conservatives? Even Christians in the article? Yeh huh, and they characterize skeptics as “denying the climate is changing?”