The New York Times says 99F in New York on June 24 is caused by the burning of fossil fuels. On May 20, 1962 it was 99F and on April 27 of that year it was 91F.
A Heat Wave Hits New York Earlier Than Usual for a Second Year in a Row – The New York Times
I remember back in June of 1994, before summer even started, New York City had a heatwave with temperatures over 100 degrees for several days in a row, as I recall. I’m definitely sure I’m right about this, and I remember because I was there. It was around the same time as the O.J. Simpson murders and the Bronco chase. I’m sure it was over 100 degrees F for a few days, and I didn’t hear anyone, including the New York Times, say, “Uh oh, climate change.” It was June, and people weren’t surprised that it was hot.
This climate change stuff is just such religious cult nonsense. If the temperature goes over 75 degrees anywhere at any time, the cultists scream about climate change. Ridiculous.
If there is a mean than there are deviations.
And those are regular part of the norm.
Many heatwaves will always happen outside of the mean timeframe.
And how can midsummer with the sun at its highest even be earlier than usual ?
Or was this June 24th a few month ealier than usual?
My guess is that the only abnormal thing here is that June 24th by coincidence (or data adjustment)never had 99 degrees before unlike the other surrounding days and they instantly abused it for FPR – fear propaganda.
Meanwhile in the real world the all time record in the city of perversion is
106 degrees and it happened in 1936 with ” perfect ” co2 levels on July 9 th.
Just 2 weeks after the date when 99 degrees are supposed to be too early.
And without the urban heat island effect and placing weather stations where they should not be, and using short term heat spikes that only last few minutes most of these new records would have never happened.
As usual, Tony pulls away the curtain and reveals the truth, leaving the journalists to seek out a safe place where their dream world cannot be challenged.
And then there is the simple fact that a single heat wave is meaningless which respect to what they are trying to show. Did they also check to see if a cold spell came earlier than usual last fall? Last longer than usual? etc. It’s as if they think a single point of data has value.
“Journalists” and news media rely upon sensationalism to sell themselves and their sponsors. The average news consumer is not interested nor excited about reports of good news nor nothing unusual.
I recently saw a report about some city, Baltimore, I think, breaking a daily high record set in 1895. Much dismay over the current cause but no interest in why it was so hot 130 years ago.