http://imperialbeach.patch.com
Never mind that it hasn’t risen at all for 30 years, and is not perceptibly different than it was 140 years ago.
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=9410170
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- “Record winter low”
- Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Record winter low”
- czechlist on “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- Bob G on “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- conrad ziefle on Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- Richard E Fritz on Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- Richard E Fritz on “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- Mike Peinsipp on “Record winter low”
- Mike Peinsipp on “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
That’s rather like using a skyscraper to demonstrate suburban living.
The scale on the left is shown to be in meters, so that would indicate a visual rise of around 30 cm in 140 years. That is not unusual but one needs to know the isostatic component in the tide gauge record to make any rel interpretation. If there was a component of uplift then the number could be quite high. If there is subsidence, then eustatic rise could be zero.
Thirty centimeters in 140 years would not be visible to people due to age expectancy and memory detail lose over time. It also wouldn’t be visible on a photograph.
I’m not disagreeing at all with your interpretation/comments, it is simply more complicated.
I was stationed on Coranado Island for awhile in the Navy. I drove down the Strand to IB several times at week. The homes on the Strand and the hotel on the north end would be inundated so I assume they are now for sale knowing what is coming with the rise in sea level.