http://climateprogress.org/2011/02/21/accuweather-joe-bastardi-resigns/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Crashex on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Robertvd on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
I would go to Climate Progress but it would count as a “hit” on the website and I cannot, in good conscience, do that.
ditto, what Chuck said
Sorry guys, I can’t help but check out the dark side from time to time. It’s strange how so many comments equate Fox news with the skeptic community.
Yes I agree with you suyts, It’s a bad idea to have only one side heard even if it is the dark side, Patients you must have (in my best Yoda voice).
(Too many YODA phrases… Must resist.. Aghhhaa..)
It’s strange how so many comments equate Fox news with the skeptic community.
Global warming: thinking not required.
“not thinking” required
Let us know when your comment is no longer awaiting moderation, Steve!
HAHAAHAHAHAHA, let me know if that gets past moderation.
Playing Climate games
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/playing_climate_games.pdf
suyts says:
February 22, 2011 at 6:06 pm
“HAHAAHAHAHAHA, let me know if that gets past moderation”.
Why do you think he published his question at his own blog.
Great move Steven Goddard.
I read that article and I have to agree with a point he made! which was that Joe Bastardi is a Long Range and Expert Meteorologist.
warmists strike again!
robert honeycutt from skepticalscience.com, the person who some days ago was proved to suffer from google scholar illiteracy by popular technology, spent whole 2 hours studying the report. his conclusion is that the last chapter of the report somehow leads the conclusion of csi into a reversed direction… which i fail to see how.
“According to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (6), the future changes in the extratropical circulation are? likely to be characterized by increases in the positive phases of the AO (referred to as the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) in the report) over the 21st century as the climate warms. The AO is closely related to the NAO in the Atlantic sector, so we infer that a positive trend in the NAO index would also occur. Therefore, we conclude that the 2009-?2010 blocked, negative phase NAO is an extreme event that is not consistent with the overall upward trend in the NAO index since 1950, and is opposite to the current understanding of projected future change in the NAO.”
any ideas, steven?