IPCC says that all the glaciers will be gone in 24 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Allan Shelton on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- DD More on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Disillusioned on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Disillusioned on 65 Years Of Progress!


Sigh……. back to the Himalayan mountains? Geez, climate alarmism is reduced to the equivalent of sequels of bad movies.
Coming soon to a science journal near you! Escape of the Arctic Ice part XXIV!!!!
On a not entirely off topic discussion, John Christy hammers alarmists in his written testimony to congress……..
“The non-falsifiable hypotheses works this way, “whatever happens is consistent with my hypothesis.” In other words, there is no event that would “falsify” the hypothesis. As such, these assertions cannot be considered science or in anyway informative since the hypothesis’ fundamental prediction is “anything may happen.” In the example above if winters become milder or they become snowier, the hypothesis stands. This is not science. As noted above, there are innumerable types of events that can be defined as extreme events – so for the enterprising individual (unencumbered by the scientific method), weather statistics can supply an almost unlimited set of targets in which to discover a “useful” extreme event.”
http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Energy/030811/Christy.pdf
emphasis mine.
Just scroll through the pictures from haze, dust, smoke, fires and volcanic eruptions at the following pages and tell me how much is man made?
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/category.php?cat_id=7
and
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/category.php?cat_id=12
It’s time the IPCC is shut up and down.
We are fed up with their hog wash science and scare mongering.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/07/helmut-schmidt-calls-for-ipcc-inquiry/
LOL at James……….
You can see the soot in any of the shots over India.
http://soundngo.com/userfiles/image/india-pollution.jpg
And much of that evil soot comes from the United States!!!