Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
Recent Comments
- Bill on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Bill on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Bob G on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Disillusioned on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Terry Shipman on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- arn on “the science is absolutely certain”
- czechlist on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- arn on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Gordon Vigurs on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Gordon Vigurs on AI Climate Math
Hmmmm, why does this number ’30’ years keep popping up again and again? I’ve seen it before.
Well, without the benefit of a fat federal grant I can say this: when there is finally enough data plotted, including weather events and climate shifts (like all this data Steve is turning up), we will then discover a magic number or range of numbers that will center around thirty. This will be akin to a Rosetta Stone. Such a magic number will not be found in a model (how could it?), instead it will be found in actual observations of course.