Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Infinite Paranoia
- “weaponized disinformation victim”
- Latest From Michael Mann
- Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Game Over For The Climate
- Another Ice Age?
- Historic Heatwave
- Historic Heatwave
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Infinite Paranoia
- Disillusioned on “weaponized disinformation victim”
- Bill Odom on Infinite Paranoia
- Russell Cook on “weaponized disinformation victim”
- Tommyb on “weaponized disinformation victim”
- Bob G on Infinite Paranoia
- Bob G on Infinite Paranoia
- William on Infinite Paranoia
- William on Infinite Paranoia
- D. Boss on Infinite Paranoia
“the general purpose of the (Economist) is to ignore any and all facts that might contradict their obsession with “global warming””
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“The Economist” is like smutty magazines, a (usually brief) period in everybody’s life. The day one “graduates” away from it, it’s another step towards adulthood.
No doubt.
Has the Economist invested in green carbon renewable schemes. The BBC has invested in carbon schemes so I can understand their desperation?” For the record I used to work for the BBC.
The SCAM is being undone one bit at a time.