Is NASA Obsessed With Carbon Dioxide?

What a pathetic excuse for a scientific institution they have become.

http://www.therepublic.com/

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Is NASA Obsessed With Carbon Dioxide?

  1. AndyW says:

    As an aside,

    http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png

    Looks like the 5 day average has swung it down as I said it would. Also the new monthly update is out here.

    http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

    “extent on this date tied for the lowest winter maximum extent in the satellite record. Air temperatures over most of the Arctic Ocean were above normal. New data on ice age shows that the amount of older, thicker ice has increased slightly over last year.”

    So ice is getting thicker though less extent. You might want to comment on their findings Steve, your Arctic posts are always good reading, even if I don’t agree with some of them 🙂

    Andy

  2. AndyW says:

    They certainly are. Not as good as NSIDC.

    Now, talking about NSIDC ….. :p

    Andy

  3. Paul H says:

    What on earth have plankton to with Space Flight?

  4. RexAlan says:

    Hi Paul H,

    What on earth have plankton to do with Space Flight?

    Nothing, except that there may well be some in the oceans below the ice on europa!

    Just a thought.

  5. omnologos says:

    It’s called NAS-Administration. No mention of “Scientific”.

  6. Mike Davis says:

    Being in Virginia Beach they can stop by Edgar Cayce’s A R E foundation for pointers about predictions! Big Jim could use some help!

  7. Andy Weiss says:

    Mike,

    Was this Edgar Cayce for real? Has he or anyone else provided hard evidence of spirit communication?

    Andy

    • Mike Davis says:

      Yes he was a real person and his story is an interesting read. I actually think he was and still is more reputable than all the Climatologists put together.
      Some believe what they read about him however history revision to create a myth is a real world issue.
      Just as there is no HARD Evidence for AGW there is no Hard Evidence for Spiritual Communication but the later has been studied and practiced much longer than the former. Spiritual Communication goes back to the Burning Bush! Climatology is a flash in the pan fad in comparison.

  8. Andy Weiss says:

    Since it’s such a profound topic, you would think that there would be more legitimate scientific study regarding the possible existence of spirits/afterlife (I’m being serious).

    Some credible people have some very believable stories. It would give climate scientists something more plausible to research!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *