Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Recent Comments
- Billyjack on COP29 Preview
- dm on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- dm on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Tel on COP29 Preview
- Robertvd on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- GW on A Giant Eyesore
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
“. . . in response to global climate change.” It’s like those telepathically connected trees that can detect global warming even when their local environment hasn’t changed a bit. Frightening when you think about it.
In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.
—Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day (1970)
I think what they’re detecting is the stuff they’re scraping from the botton of the barrel.
In their MODEL they use” a future value (970 parts per million)” of CO2. They really think it’s going to go that way? I bet that they assume all of this CO2 would be from man? NOT a chance in h*ll! On what idiotic basis do they assume such unfounded inanity/?
They probably believe the half-life of CO2 in the atmosphere is 1000 years (a la NASA fabrication) when it’s really about 5 years. Uninformed is as uninformed does.
That was my reaction. First I thought – ah some science. But no – it’s just another worthless model. Where do they get the funding?
Hig, that’s because nothing happened until they hit 970 ppm. They couldn’t show the results they wanted below that.
970 makes more DMS, which makes more clouds.
Phyto is a plant, CO2 is plant food…
They didn’t/couldn’t model more clouds and more phyto……………..
Add another one to the …
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm
It is not there yet even with 859 items!
I think that Steve or Anthony should contact them and see about partnering up or something. That list is probably a few hundred shy at this point.