Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- arn on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gordon Vigurs on COP29 Preview
- Peter Carroll on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
gee, and only 50 years after the Little Ice Age…………….
That can not be as it was Before Satellites! Weather and climate were stable before satellites. Maybe in this case correlation is causation and the launching of satellites disrupted the ocean atmosphere interface causing catastrophic climate.
BS. I like it!
So this article is dated 26 April 1939. 40 years BS.
Presently it is 12 August 2011. 32 years AS.
CS
Current Satellite!!!!
PMS
Post Modern Satellite
After Satellite Syncronazition
???? ??????
Load of rubbish. They can judge 20% ice loss from ” ship observations ” … like what obversations did they do?
From that they managed to explain Baffin Bay and also India getting hotter.
Wow, that is some extrapolation.
Andy
Some people have trouble with reading and comprehension – or at least the comprehension part.
Does the newspaper article say that Arctic sea ice shrank? No, it says Barents Sea ice shrank. The Barents is a marginal arctic sea – today it is essentially ice-free four months of the year. Scientific research shows the maximum August sea ice extent for the Barents Sea occurred in 1866. Minimum extent was in 1995, but as a marginal arctic sea it is highly variable and little can be extrapolated from Barents sea ice extent minima or maxima to the arctic as a whole.
Yes you do. You seem to have missed the part about 18 years of research showing warmer winters and hotter summers at both poles. Just flew right over your head.
In other words – you have no defense for your misleading title.
If you actually read the article it says a FORECAST for warmer winters and summers. Didn’t I just say that extrapolating (forecasting) from a marginal arctic sea is unreliable? I answered your little red-herring argument before you even made it – and you never even noticed 🙂 Duh!
You see, I can read and I actually understand the words as written.
You use trivial facts, anecdotes, etc the way a drunk uses a lamp-post – for support, not illumination.
You are an idiot.
SG:You are an idiot.
Translation: Poor reading and comprehension skills leads to misleading headline and epic fail rebuttal. SG can’t answer with facts or logic so he resorts to meaningless insults. Lather, rinse, repeat.
You, my friend, are a sad excuse for a sentient being, but very entertaining in a Three Stooges/ Keystone Kops sort a way. It always brightens my weekend to read the surreal stupidity that originates here.
What a moron
I called that one in advance 🙂
KO: SG can’t answer with facts or logic so he resorts to meaningless insults. Lather, rinse, repeat. .
Recession? Quick! Somebody please tell Obama the shrinking ice is the cause of the poor economic recovery!