Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
Death spiral in the making! (sarc)
Hey! That;s great news. Vineyards spreadin out far and wide.
When Asian soot finally melts all the multi-year ice, that curve will bottom out. The limit is probably 10,000 km^3.
I want it this year. The hysteria from the CAGW d!ck-heads would be the funniest thing, especially when NOTHING really catastrophic follows.
Like watching a particularly ugly balloon deflate.
Where’s the nobhead Ellis these days?
Maybe I’m the only one, who does not get it, but to me the trend shows there IS something going on with the Arctic ice. I mean, having the ice extent somewhere around median is nice, but according to the chart, ice is obviously getting thinner. Why is that?
PIOMAS is a model. They have corrected several times to avoid the embarrassing
earlier-than-expected-zero-model-volume-yet-real-cold-touchable-cubic-kilometers-of-ice scenario.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/06/28/piomas-arctic-sea-ice-volume-model-corrected-still-appears-suspect/
That explains it. I thought it was real (well, as real as you can get) data. Thanks a lot.