http://www.utexas.edu/know/2010/11/09/climate_myth2/
That isn’t to say that water vapor doesn’t matter. All climate models incorporate its effects in their simulations. The difference is that climate scientists consider it a feedback rather than a main driver of climate change. That’s because of observations showing that regardless of changes in global temperatures, global relative humidity stays fairly constant.
What the author is saying is that water vapour doesn’t feed back, proving that it is a feedback.
lol, that is a “D’oh” moment, but ………..”That’s because of observations showing that regardless of changes in global temperatures, global relative humidity stays fairly constant.”……………………….I’m wondering if the percentage of change differs much from the percentage of change in the earth’s temp. I’m betting the variance is just about the same. I’d take time to look it up, but I’m hoping some alarmist comes by.
How come GISS is present before 1970s on the chart, and the slope of the chart from 1920 to 1940 is the same as the latest slope?
How come BBC can use 100% CO2 glass bottles on national tv to explain the climate, but if it proves that CO2 is saturated then ummm the experiement is all wrong???
Hey look “Experts” showing us the atmosphere in 100% concentration atmosphere on national TV but the other scientists using normal levels in a bottle is wrong
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/8418356.stm