Real Climate Science

Katharine Hayhoe and her partners in crime have officially released their National climate assessment, which includes this graph, which claims “Record Warm Daily Temperatures Are Occurring More Often”

CSSR2017_FullReport.pdf

The first thing I noticed is that the text in the report does not match the graph. They say :

the Dust Bowl era of the 1930s remains the peak period for extreme heat in the United States

Yet the graph right below it does not show the 1930’s as being hot.

Unfortunately for Katharine and her band of climate fraudsters, I have software which does this calculation. The graph below is the correct version. Their graph is more or less correct after 1970 – but the pre–1970 data is completely fraudulent. They removed all of the hot weather from 1930 to 1954.  NOAA does not make adjustments to daily temperatures, so they can’t use that excuse.

The report claims :

Record Warm Daily Temperatures Are Occurring More Often

That is an outright lie.  Record warm daily maximum temperatures have decreased sharply since 1930 – the start date of their graph.

The number of record daily minimums has also decreased.

The US climate is getting milder, with fewer very hot or very cold days.

So why the big spikes in 2012 and 2016?

This is a classic divide by zero error. Ratios become unstable when the denominator becomes small. The numbers are meaningless. No serious scientist would release a wildly flawed and dishonest graph like Katharine Hayhoe does on a consistent basis.

There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

• Mark Twain

Ninety five years ago the Arctic was experiencing radical climate change, disappearing glaciers, and unheard of high temperatures.

2 Nov 1922, Page 1 – Great Bend Tribune at Newspapers.com

But not to worry! By 1970, scientists were worried about thickening Arctic ice and a new ice age.

U.S. and Soviet Press Studies of a Colder Arctic – The New York Times

This sort of cyclical climatic behavior doesn’t match CO2 warming theory, so NASA simply erased the prior warmth.

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

Government climate science has nothing to do with climate or science. It is a group of criminals extorting money from the public with fake data, fake theories and zero integrity.

NASA can’t put people in space any more, but back during the space age of 1969-1970 –  scientists were determined to blame something on your car. They just couldn’t make up their minds whether it was global warming or global cooling. In 1969, the New York Times predicted an ice-free Arctic by 1989, and three days later predicted a new ice age.

Expert Says Arctic Ocean Will Soon Be an Open Sea – Catastrophic Shifts in Climate Feared

Science – Worrying About a New Ice Age – NYTimes.com

The Chicago Tribune summed up the settled science very succinctly.

06 Feb 1970, Page 12 – Chicago Tribune at Newspapers.com

The extent of multi-year ice in the Arctic is not much different than it was in 1971, indicating that the planet has neither warmed nor cooled very much.

1971    2017

Climate scientists had no clue what they were talking about (just like now)  – but according to Democrats – Exxon knew!

Democrats also tell me I am part of a massively funded big oil/big tobacco conspiracy to destroy the climate.

All through the summer and the first half of autumn, we saw a large drop in daily maximum temperatures after the 1950’s and early 1960’s. But this time of year does not show that. Temperatures have trended up.

Note the step up in the 1970’s – the exact opposite of what the summer temperatures show.

If there were any real climatologists out there, wouldn’t they want to understand this – rather than bury it?

It is a beautiful warm day in Boulder, with west winds bringing in very clear air. I see engineering miracles everywhere I look. It is glorious!

Man-made data tampering is responsible for virtually all imaginary global warming since 1950.

I’m going to keep analyzing data and asking questions.  That is what I do.

If I upset your sacred cows and you can’t handle it – then adios. I respond to rational discussion, and have little tolerance for hysteria. I blocked several thousand twitter followers last year over their Never-Trump stand. They were 100% certain that Trump was a closet Democrat, and was worse than Hillary.

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

• Thomas Jefferson

Keep an open mind, and free from the propaganda you were raised with.

My two primary mechanisms for uncovering climate fraud are looking at raw data and looking at historical accounts. I’m doing exactly the same thing with the JFK shooting analysis.

The original news stories were unambiguous that Kennedy was killed by a shot through the right temple, and that the police believed the kill shot came from the “grassy knoll.” This was reported in just about every newspaper in the country. The grassy knoll was not conspiracy theory, that was where the police at the scene thought the kill shot came from.

22 Nov 1963, Page 1 – Lansing State Journal at Newspapers.com

Here is the video of White House press secretary Malcolm Kilduff announcing the shot to the right temple, on November 22, 1963.

Rear Admiral George Burkley was the White House Medical Officer, and he reported that Kennedy was shot in the right temple. That is exactly what the Zapruder video shows. The violent movement of Kennedy’s head and body back and to the left is exactly what would be expected from a soft bullet which lodged in his skull and transferred all of the momentum into his skull. The laws of conservation of momentum are pretty well established. The bright white circle in Kennedy’s skull appears immediately after impact and remains until his head drops out of view. There is no indication of damage to the back of the skull.

James Files claims to be one of the actual hitmen, and has presented a very credible story about what happened that day.

As I squeezed off my round, the head started forward, I hit it and blew the head backwards.

James Files claims he killed John F Kennedy as he prepares for his release | Daily Mail Online

His story matches the historical evidence. Lee Harvey Oswald was murdered in the police station on his way to his first court appearance. Obviously somebody didn’t want him to testify.  By killing Oswald before he could testify, that made it possible to claim Oswald acted alone. Files says he was only supposed to shoot Kennedy if no head shot from the rear had occurred.

Claims that the kill shot came from the rear have no credibility. The video clearly shows that was not the case. JFK was shot by at least two, and probably three bullets. One or two of those came from the rear. If you want to understand what happened that day, I strongly suggest you clear your head of the BS you were raised with and watch this video with an open mind. Files testimony is extremely detailed and matches the historical evidence.

Also watch what his prison warden had to say about him.

Some readers have gotten very agitated about me discussing this. They can feel free to quit reading the blog.  This is what I do. I write about people attempting to rewrite history.

What is astonishing to me is that anyone actually believes the official version of what happened that day. It is as credible as NASA’s temperature graphs.

Donna Brazille, who was fired from the DNC and CNN for rigging the debates in Hillary’s favor, says that Russians hacked the Wikileaks E-mail, and that her predecessor (Debbie Wasserman Schulz) rigged the primaries against Bernie.

Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC – POLITICO Magazine

There is no doubt that the DNC hacked the election, but there has never been any evidence presented that Russians hacked the Wikileaks e-mails. Wikileaks has flat out stated that the E-mails did not come from any government entity, and that they have never been contacted by the FBI.

The only proven election hacking and collusion was from Hillary and the DNC, who cheated their voters out of the right to choose their candidate.

Blaming Russia for Wikileaks is baseless conspiracy theory – designed to distract from Hillary’s actual election hacking, which was exposed by Wikileaks. A classic case of shooting the messenger.