Madam President

This was the front page of the Australian one year ago today.

While the press was busy doing their usual thing (cheating, lying, tampering and defrauding) I was celebrating with Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts in front of Parliament House.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Madam President

  1. gregole says:

    And I’m still not tired of winning!

  2. Kris Johanson says:

    And now they’re literally “screaming at the sky” like spoilt children (or mentally insane people)

    • arn says:

      Well,those most screaming are the MSM and other corporations and their indoctrinated puppets.

      The plan was simple:
      Pull another Obama.
      By creating and installing the next artificiall puppet for the globalists and deep state pretending to be POTUS
      they knew they could get away with anything,
      just like they did with Obama:
      Destroying the constitution=no problem
      destroying sovereignity= no problem
      destroying other countries= no problem
      flooding the country(and therefore bancrupting in the long run) with illegals= no problem
      Giving billions to the banksters for their crimes instead of persecuting them= no problem
      Giving automatic weapons to mexican drug cartells(Fast&Furious scandal)= no problem
      Giving weapons to muslim terrorists= no problem
      Contaminating entire regions with uran ammo= no problem

      All this would have been possible(just as it was with Obama)
      by simply installing a ‘minority” as Potus
      as the only thing the MSM has to do is sell people this fake and staged BS and sell out as “HISTORIC-look at how tolerant and progressive we are”(and all the naive BS white leftists want to hear) and Hitlery would have had a fools license to get away with anything-she could set the world on fire and people would be kissing her butt,

  3. Rah says:

    Some think that Michelle Obama will run for POTUS in 2020. They believe that Donna Brazile is trying to clear the decks for that effort. Is the Democrat bench that weak? Are they that stupid? The answers to both questions is yes IMO.

    • Kris Johanson says:

      Yeah, I heard that on Rush today. Based on Donna’s comments about Michelle, it sounds like a possibility

    • tonyheller says:

      It would be the second time Michelle was proud of America

    • JTW says:

      hmm, as Trump said when Hillary announced she might run again: “please do” :)

      We haven’t seen the last of the Clintons yet though, there’s Chelsea still who’s being groomed for the job. Not 2020 I think, they want to let the dust settle a bit first probably. But 2024? Quite possible.

    • feathers says:

      Incredibly, she would win Virginia.

      I would enjoy watching her and Kamala Harris sling mud at each other during the primary, that actually would be “must see TV.”

    • arn says:

      You can be sure that the next globalist,deep state pupp….oops i mean:the next democratic candidate will be part of some kind of minority which people are not allowed to criticize:
      Be it female,or black,or mexican,or muslim or jewish,or gay or transvestite(or whatever)
      or a mix of all these groups.
      So that the MSM can sell this fake and staged puppet to the people as “historic vote/progressivism/tolerance” etc
      and that everyone who does even dare to criticize them
      for what they do(and not what they are)
      can instantly be demonized and stigmatised with their fascist rhetorics as Mysoginist/Islamophob/Xenophob/Antisemitic/Xenophob/Transphob
      though the critics have absolutely nothing to do with the
      origin but with the crimes of the corporate puppet posing as POTUS.

      (and i’m pretty sure it would be someone who was sponsored his whole life by superrich people(as obama by the family crown and the saudis)
      or maybe some superrich “philantroph” like Zuckerberg)

  4. feathers says:

    For me, the most telling moment of how our lives were going to be dictated for decades if Clinton won was during the VP debate (remember, there was only one).

    Do you all recall the “right-hand-person” comment from Kaine? There was so much PC bullish** loaded into that response. We were all going to become domesticated, PC zombies where no-one has the gumption to simply state the obvious…the emperor has no clothes. Say it with me, Right-Hand-MAN! I also have no problem whatsoever with right-hand-WOMAN.

    Thank you Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida, N. Carolina, Ohio, and Iowa!

  5. CheshireRed says:

    It was and remains a thing of absolute beauty. The stunned dawn of realisation that nope, Hillary wasn’t going to win and worse, far, far worse, The Donald was steamrolling his way into the White House.
    UK liberal media was every bit as humiliated (if such a thing could be) as when Brexit occurred. Buy 1 stunning election result, get another free! Superb.

  6. Steelman says:

    Everybody with half a brain had to see that Trump was bound to win. I attended two rallies, both with 15- 20 000 people.
    Hillary had like 200 at the most. MSM knew, but they carried on, hoping that all the voter frauds, would pull Clinton Trough.
    It was amazing to see how all the enthusiasm, slowly curbed, and finally left the news anchors, shivering in tears. Media bias, anyone?

    • Stewart Pid says:

      Clinton trough … Freudian slip?

      • Steelman says:

        Pull her trough, to victory, was the meaning. Think most people got that. Can’t cope with possible lack of imagination, or english is maybe not your language?

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          Of course, we all got. The spellcheckers get us now and then but I like the thought of software suffering Freudian slips. I have this wild imagination.

          • Steelman says:

            Off cause. The missing h. Typing fast. It’s so nice when people destroying all off your points, pointing out a typo. Have to admit, english is not my language, either. Well, no big deal. I just stay away from this place.

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            Stay away from this place? Why?

            I took Stewart’s comment as a good-natured reaction to typos that happen to all of us here, native speakers or not *). Tony’s blog has a global reach and there are many commenters for whom English is not their native language. I do not think Stewart was trying to destroy your points but rather to humorously amplify them. In fact, I am happy myself that the voters could pull the “Clinton Trough” away from the whole corrupt family. ;-)

            You did understand my comment was just as good-natured, didn’t you?

            *) Did you notice the typo in my previous response? I wanted to say “of course, we all got it” but the it somehow got away from me and I didn’t catch it.

  7. Timo, not that one says:

    “Goodbye Cleavage”!
    I sure hope that’s fake news too.

  8. Steelman says:

    Guess you’re right, Colorado, I just was in a bad mood. I’m usually good in english, but typos do accur. And now, i also know what a Freudian slip is, maybe Stewart was right. MSM stinks to high heaven. On that, I think we all can agree,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.